What Is The Difference Between Working Line and Show Line? - Page 4

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Baldursmom

by Baldursmom on 25 January 2009 - 15:01

Orginal poster, remember, a lot depends on how and who you train with as well as how much!!  I showline that had the required dirves can do it, they do not compete because it is not the focus of the owners.   A working dog owner trains for the trial competition and the work the dog is doing, most likely daily.    They are true altheletes like marathon runners or tri-athalon competitors.

My dogs sibling has her Sch 2 is hot trained and works with a working club even though she is showline.  She was at the end of the line at the 2008 NASS.  She and her owner are dedicated to the sport, get passable and honest scoring.   So it is possible with the right dog. 

Tony, you outed me!!!!  I know how you feel, I have been there.  I needed to make a choice for what I wanted for my future and the future of the GSD.  I beleive there is talent in those lines that is untaped.   Yes, there are problems, but I don't see them as black and white as you do.  A trophy at the shows has been far a few between for me, and they really don't mean much.   Not much more that the quiky Sch titles really.   The adoring look of those brown eyes of my dogs and  the letters I get from happy owners of my pups is my reward.  Quiting was not the answer for me.  It would help no one, least of all the dogs.  One of the things I am trying to get through to the original poster, I am not sure you understand.  "G" s problems in your house  (as I understood them) are qualities that make a good sch dog, you yourself could not live with her intense drives

I have looked at several other way to train my dog (not plural as I have control over only one), however, it seems that every training center has there hands out more so.  One, charges $40 per session, three sessions for full sch lesson per week, that's $120 I do not have.  This working dog trainer has only taken one of his dogs to sch 3, he has the same problems I have, he has to work full time to feed his family and his dogs.   Another was just too far away with gas over $4 a gallon and the threat of losing my job over my head. 

I love the look of the showlines, so I take the good with the bad and hope I can make a difference in the long run. 


Rexy

by Rexy on 25 January 2009 - 16:01

In competitions where primarily working lines are used, what proof is required to confirm that the dog entered is a GSD and not a GSD mixed with something else to improve it's working ability???.

Pictures I have seen of some working line dogs apart from their ears resembling a GSD, they look completely different in size, build, body shape, colour and look facially different. Wouldn't there have to be a "line" where a particular dog is too far outside of the breed standards to be regarded and entered in competition as a GSD???.

by Gustav on 25 January 2009 - 16:01

The difference in show dogs and working dogs is two things,1) Genetics, showdogs have been linebred on the same two dogs(Quanto/Canto) for the past 10  to 15 generations, 2) Color, the color of winning show dogs has become arbitrary,(black and red/tan).There are show dogs that can work, but minimally and there are workingdogs that need improvement in conformation(some show dogs too), but the problem is that the 10 to 15 years of linebreeding on 2 dogs makes it very very difficult to improve the temperament status EVEN if they did go out to genetic diversity. You can't reverse in one or two breedings to dogs outside that show sphere genetically when it is saturated with 10 to 15 generations of clog. Won't happen, can't happen, and HASN'T happened. With the workinglines you can have vast improvements in a short period in structure because the genetic diversity has not saturated the dog with traits that are 10 to 15 generations entrenched. This is the difference in the two lines...this isn't opinion of Gustav, this is empirical truth.....If people can't see and acknowledge this thus continuing the trends outlined, then the split cannot nor should be reconciled.

divmstr1988

by divmstr1988 on 25 January 2009 - 17:01

Baldursmom, like I said I agree with what you posted here, and I do understand what you are saying to the original poster. I am not here to pick on you, sorry if that's what you took from my last post. I was just stating my opinion.
As far a "G" goes I do feel she has the drive that it takes to make a good schutzhund dog, but first that is not what is in the cards for her. she is going to be a breeding bitch and that is all. The reason I got rid of her had nothing to do with her intense drive, remember my male is just as intense and more. "G" was not my dog, she was basically my daughter's dog, and the breeders they were co-owning her. Like I have said many times I am not interested in becoming a breeder, nor am I doing this for the money. I am interested in the schutzhund competitions.
yes $4000/per pup is a very tempting offer for many, and it's nice to get your hands on some extra bucks here and there, but raising a dog to be breeding stock is not what I want from my dogs. I am sorry but I also will not raise a dog that is co-owned, pay for all of it's expenses, vets, food etc.......... then get 25% of the value of the pups while the other co-owner(breeder) takes 75% just for whelping the litter, especially if I don't want to be in the business of making pups. not a good econimical choice.
That is the reason I have always gone for the males.
 I believe the biggest difference between showline and workingline, is really ones personal choice, colors, and workingline owners I feel are into the workability of their dogs, experiencing the spirit of competion with their dogs and friends, enjoying the breed for what it is, not for a beauty pagent throphy, and from what I have seen most are not into it just for the money either.

Baldursmom

by Baldursmom on 25 January 2009 - 18:01

Divemaster, I PM'ed you as this is not the place to continue this.

4pack

by 4pack on 25 January 2009 - 18:01

"In competitions where primarily working lines are used, what proof is required to confirm that the dog entered is a GSD and not a GSD mixed with something else to improve it's working ability???.

Pictures I have seen of some working line dogs apart from their ears resembling a GSD, they look completely different in size, build, body shape, colour and look facially different. Wouldn't there have to be a "line" where a particular dog is too far outside of the breed standards to be regarded and entered in competition as a GSD???."

Rexy, this is very telling. That you feel this way tells me you have seem a majority of SL dogs and your eyes are accustomes to seeing that Blk/Red and huge body mass. At a major trial you are not going to get anyone wanting to train up a mutt and try to pass it off as a GSD. Too much time and money go into training a dog to that level. Registration papers and DNA testing pretty much can make sure they are all on the up and up. I have seen some "ugly" dogs here in pictures but non that I know attend the huge trials and competitions.

Thank you Gustav for answering the question I posted couple days ago on another thread...Which can be corrected faster, Conformation or Temperament? You above post was what I also feel to be true. When my common sense realized this, that is when  gave up on the SL, it cannot be fixed in my lifetime, improving my WL structure can. For me, the SL is a lost cause and I do't really want or need their blood back into the WL.

 


lancegfx

by lancegfx on 25 January 2009 - 19:01

Aïe Aïe Aïe   

Rexy

by Rexy on 27 January 2009 - 17:01

4pack, I was thinking more on the lines of for example a Golden Retriever derived as a working dog from a breeding program mixing Flatcoated Retrievers with various other breeds for the purpose of increasing it's speed in the water. The Golden was a better working dog than the Flatcoat although apart from mainly colour, they look much the same. Flatcoats are black or liver in colour and slightly larger than the Golden. They were originally all called Flatcoats but the golden ones were the choice for serious gun dog work similar to the working line GSD. They re-named the gold Flatcoats Golden Retrievers in the end as a separate breed.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top