Von Hunterhaus, 39 dogs seized - Page 36

Kitkat, I really believe that you love dogs, but why are you willing to help a person that kept 39 dogs in cages?
What do I miss? I don´t know any of the people involved, but this kind of hording was not normal and not in accordance with any animal protection laws.

mirasmom, what papers do you have showing ownership? Are the AKC cerified papers in your name or did you meet in some mall or coffee shop to get signatures (maybe even backdated) to say you now own the dogs seized? Copy and show your ownership papers, I dare you. Show us your paperwork and proof of ownership. Otherwise you are just part of this mess trying to pretend you owned a dog before February 9th, 2014. If you truly owned the dog the certificate would have your name on the front....not just faked on the back.

I apoligize to mirasmom, I meant sitasmom. Show us the proof of ownership you claim gives you rights to the dogs....we are not strangers here to what is real and what is created. If your name is one the front of the certificate and it was processed before Feb 09, 2014 you may have a claim....if your name is on the back of the certificate( and perhaps with a phony date we will all know you are part of the problem).Bring it on because the AKC suspended all paperwork transfers on this person effective the date of her arrest. If you clearly owned the dog prior to the seizure your name would be on the front of the certificate! oh gosh..too much info.

Never mind.

Soon there will be more owners than dogs. these "owners" forfeited there rights to ownership when they left them with dawn and knew and accepted the inhumane conditions in this puppy factory or they never bothered to visit them to find out, love their dogs lmao if it wasn't so pathetic. i guess why visit and check on their welfare if the money for puppies was rolling in, what matters the conditions as long as they exist enough to sustain puppies.

It is the way that the humane siciety habdled this that I am willing to take a stand against.

How dare they  "sell" others peoples dogs, to other breeders. It is the usual procedure ANY dog getting adopted out of any humane society be spayed and neutered, not given to friends to profit at the dogs expense.

    That is just wrong. This  Perez guy stating "charlitans"... the laws are supposed to protect the animals,

Not profit off them!

If those new owners treat the dogs with the dignity they deserve and the authority covers some expenses in the process then it's a good process that i am sure joe public will be morally satisfied with. if these saga makes some breeders think they could be subject to the same treatment....GOOD another great outcome.

mooma, some of these dogs (at least 4) have been properly registered to their owners for several years, but the akc will not stand up to the corruption.

after being asked, the akc said they would register any dog to whom ever won the court battle, no matter who it was registered to before. that they, the akc doesn't proove ownership.

only one of the dogs has been returned, and only because it had an abcess became worse when the SPCA feed him food with grain and treated it with the wrong meds. they ordered the owner to come within one day or it would be pts!

BTW, that dog is completely healed now.

"   but the akc will not stand up to the corruption."
???
I think, it´s a court case, and the questioned dogs are going nowhere until there is a court decision ( only 4 dogs? where are all the rightful owners people talked about? Where are all the European owners? There dogs are not AKC registered...) .
What has AKC to do with that? It´s a registry, no investigating agency.

 

I really don´t know, so this is a honest question - Is a AKC pedigree an official document with official proof of ownership or is it just a "pedigree" ?