Understanding what is the meaning of life - Page 32

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 31 August 2010 - 03:08

The meaning of life will not be found on a dog forum.

I have faith and it is no bodies business but mine.

Moons what the hell happened to the music thread I am about ready to put last dance on it.

Gotta go.

LMAO

by Royal1 on 31 August 2010 - 04:08

Two Moons, I would have gave you respect if you didn't use F*** word.

Demons believe there is God, but of course you probably don't believe demons existence.

by Royal1 on 31 August 2010 - 06:08

geordiegaviino says,
The meaning of life is a difficult one and it is one that we will only discover when we die

We have time now
after death it's too late and no point.


Two Moons

by Two Moons on 31 August 2010 - 07:08

The word is short,
slang for,
Fornication.
I believe the word to be very old in origins.

Everyone has their demons of one form or another, do I think demons exist?
Yes, among humans they do, right along side saints if I may use your terminology.

Only humans know about good and evil, they knew before they were told.




Shtal

by Shtal on 31 August 2010 - 07:08

Evidence from Space of a Young Earth

There are a number of factors from space that limit the age of the universe or earth to within a few thousand years. Though it cannot be scientifically proven exactly when the universe was created, its age can be shown to NOT be billions of years.

* The shrinking sun limits the earth-sun relationship to fewer than billions of years. The sun is losing both mass and diameter. Changing the mass would upset the fine gravitational balance that keeps the earth at just the right distance for life to survive (1, p. 169; 2, p. 30; 4, pp. 56-63; 5, p. 26; 6, p. 43; 7; 11, p.34-35 ).
* The 1⁄2 inch layer of cosmic dust on the moon indicates the moon has not been accumulating dust for billions of years (2, p. 26; 3, p. 22; 4, p. 15; 6, p. 35; 7; 9, p. 25; 11, pp. 33, 80). NOTE: Insufficient evidence to be positive
* The existence of short-period comets indicates the universe is less than billions of years old (2, p. 31; 3, p. 27; 4, p. 35; 6, p. 37; 11, p.29;12, p.22).
* Fossil meteorites are very rare in layers other than the top layers of the earth. This indicates that the layers were not exposed for millions of years as is currently being taught in school textbooks (4, p. 26; 11, pp. 27, 67).
* The moon is receding from the earth a few inches each year. Billions of years ago the moon would have been so close that the tides would have been much higher, eroding the continents quickly (3, p. 25; 6, p. 43; 7; 11, p. 33).
* The moon contains considerable quantities of U-236 and Th- 230, both short-lived isotopes that would have been long gone if the moon were billions of years old (8, p. 177; see also 4, p. 51 & 11, p. 28 for information on rock “flow”).
* The existence of great quantities of space dust, which by the Poynting-Robertson effect would have been vacuumed out of our solar system in a few thousand years, indicates the solar system is young (3, p. 29; 6, p.44; 11, p. 33, 80; 12, pp.87-88).
* At the rate many star clusters are expanding, they could not have been traveling for billions of years (3, p. 29; 4, pp. 30 and 59; 6, p. 44; 11, p. 82).
* Saturn’s rings are still unstable, indicating they are not billions of years old (4, p. 45; 7; 11, p.22-23).
* Jupiter and Saturn are cooling off rather rapidly. They are losing heat twice as fast as they gain it from the sun. They cannot be billions of years old (5, p. 26; 4, p. 43).
* Jupiter’s moon, Io, is losing matter to Jupiter. It cannot be billions of years old (4, p. 3; 7;11, p. 23).
* Jupiter’s moon, Ganymede has a strong magnetic field (7).

Among other factors to consider is that all the ancient astronomers from 2,000 years ago recorded that Sirius was a red star—today it is a white dwarf. Obviously, the view of modern astronomy text- books that billions of years are required for a star to “evolve” from a red giant to a white dwarf needs to be restudied (4, p.7).
www.drdino.com/evidence-from-space-of-a-young-earth/


Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 31 August 2010 - 07:08


Two Moons

by Two Moons on 31 August 2010 - 07:08

Har har,
I like to never got out of that damned website sock....


by beetree on 31 August 2010 - 12:08

Why shouldn't animals enjoy the view? I think they do just because they can.  I know for a fact, King Kong enjoyed a good sunset!

 

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 31 August 2010 - 23:08

King Kong was hoping to get lucky.....lol
He wasn't thinking about that sunset at all...  you can see it in his eyes.
You can tell he's working things out in his mind, he's got a big problem to solve.....lol

Shtal

by Shtal on 01 September 2010 - 05:09

I would like to leave small message,
I have been warn - ahead of time that I will be wasting time here, this is wrong place to talk about the truth.
But I had a very small hope inside me that some people may listen about the truth.

There may well be some people understand me but they were in silence, either way - let it rest in peace.


From Shtal...........






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top