
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Bark and Hold on 07 January 2009 - 17:01
At the risk of sounding redundant, I still feel that the issue here is not "show line" vs "working line", but rather, genetics and responsible genetic manipulation (I am not pointing fingers at anyone.) Max von Stephantiz started the SV in 1899, which is a little over one hundred years. From an evolutionary standpoint, one hundred years might as well be one hundred seconds.
The dangers of inbreeding and segregating gene pools is not my opinion, it is scientific fact. Most "bad" or "undesirable" traits are recessive, and when you limit the size of your gene pool, you increase the likelihood of seeing and propagating these hurtful traits. I feel that people in both camps are guilty of breeding for traits that might cause serious problems down the line.
A great example of this in the wild is the plight of cheetahs in Africa which are possibly moving toward extinction. Whether because of manmade or natural causes, the cheetahs in Africa are living in isolated gene pools which are driving them toward extinction. These dangerous recessive traits that are becoming more prevalent are not always visible "genetic deformities... They might be seen as an inability to hunt for prey, an inability to reproduce naturally, an inability to successfully care for their young, etc...
I just feel that we should be a little more aware of the consequences of what could happen to the GSD.

by Kaffirdog on 07 January 2009 - 17:01
I'm puzzled why Snaiper is keen to bring in Mali s and Dutchies to "improve" the working line GSD, can't see anything wrong with them as they are myself. Can't speak for Dutchies as I've no experience of them, but I've had experience of quite a few of Malis and can't see any advantage to introducing them, I prefer the substance and stronger nerve of the GSD any day and think the Mali would benefit far more from the odd infusion of GSD blood than the other way round.
Margaret N-J

by Silbersee on 07 January 2009 - 17:01
It was one of my new year's resolutions to stay off this message board. As a matter of fact I had promised my husband and one of my friends that, but I have to say something about the following statement Bancroft made:
Kennels who do intercross are in the vast minority. They usually breed for the active companion market and people who want to dabble in club level sport, agility, obedience.

by snajper69 on 07 January 2009 - 17:01
Bark and Hold Finaly someone try's to see the big picture.
Kczaj you make very good point regarding some dog's not being worked correctly, as well that some are just screw up because fo bad breeding.
Gustav, I always enjoy your post and you do make a lot of good points.

by Silbersee on 07 January 2009 - 17:01
I don' know why the rest of my message did not post, but here it is:
While there might be "kennels" like that, especially the ones who conveniently own both male and female, this is absolutely not true. Quite a few kennels in Germany and elsewhere are looking for the betterment of the breed by selecting more "balanced" animals to bring the breed back to what it used to be. If it will work remains to be seen, but please check with Arlett, Wildsteiger Land, Bad-Boll, Laerchenhain etc. for these so-called mixes.

by Silbersee on 07 January 2009 - 17:01

by Silbersee on 07 January 2009 - 17:01

by Silbersee on 07 January 2009 - 18:01
I am sorry but I give up. For some reason, the text does not show. But when I ue the "edit" button, it is right there.
by kioanes on 07 January 2009 - 18:01
maybe the text color was set to white? ( there, but invisible)

by missbeeb on 07 January 2009 - 18:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top