
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by BabyEagle4U on 31 August 2009 - 16:08
-- You sound racist to me. If you doubt there's brothers who have accomplished their dreams in America your mistaken. I dunno where you people come from, but in my neck of the woods these brothers have accomplished what they goaled for, and now they are ridin' da train. And it's NOT the current Obama train.
Do you people remember pre-stimulous package when the Cato Institute (LOL) named 300 leading economists .. well, I'd like to refresh your memory as to of those 300, 129 was brothers.
Also, there's Ron Paul Meet-up's with over 4200 active members from Harrisburg to Philly and 33% are brothers.
I'm about tired of you idiots spewing one way or another people being racist or/and uneducated. YOU are the people that hate, and clearly YOU people are the beings uneducated. And when I say uneducated ... I mean that light-heartedly .. not everyone gives a damn about this country as founded, I know this ... theirs no excuse for an out right traitor. In my mind it's the traitors are the racists, that is evident. Again, when I say traitors, I mean anti -1776.
What are you idiots gonna do when it's time to ANTIUP. LMAO
Imagine that.

by MaggieMae on 31 August 2009 - 16:08
.

by sueincc on 31 August 2009 - 16:08
So I have to hand it to whomever is really pulling the strings, nice job, and the joke is definitely on us. You even went to the trouble of creating a cyber life for them to make them more realistic. Well done!!!!
Oh and BE: You need to dial it back, fool. I am the one who called someone a "racist" and it had nothing to do with liberal or conservative views or party affiliations so stop making up shit. I called rayray a racist because he had the disgusting and immoral nerve to suggest a "necktie" party might be in order for Obama AND because he tossed around the "n" word AND because he denigrated people of color more than once in multiple threads. So I don't give a shit what you are tired of, I call it like I see it.

by judron55 on 31 August 2009 - 16:08

by Prager on 31 August 2009 - 19:08
Ad hominem is the lowest and most primitive form of sophistry. It is an argument of people who have no other way to make their emotional point.
An ad hominem argument has this basic form:
Person A makes claim X
There is something objectionable about Person A
Therefore claim X is false
This is an illogical leap and make me smile to see idiotic logic like that. If opponent uses it against anybody then I immediately know that they have nothing substantial to say. Empty suit.
Ad hominem abusive (also called argumentum ad personam) usually and most notoriously involves insulting or belittling one's opponent, but can also involve pointing out factual but ostensible character flaws or actions which are irrelevant to the opponent's argument. This tactic is logically fallacious because insults and even true negative facts about the opponent's personal character have nothing to do with the logical merits of the opponent's arguments or assertions..
This tactic is frequently employed as a propaganda tool among people who are attempting to influence the others through an appeal to emotion rather than by logical means, especially when their own position is logically weaker than their opponent's.
You look really poorly if you are using it. :)
Prager(Hans)
http://www.alpinek9.com

by sueincc on 31 August 2009 - 19:08
uh huh. Sort of like the illogical and fractured logic of jumping to the conclusion that those who's viewpoints you perceive to be liberal or those with whom you disagree must therefore be socialists or worse yet, will be responsible for the USA's (according to you apparently imminent) take over by which country - communist China or maybe Cuba.

by MaggieMae on 31 August 2009 - 19:08
.

by Prager on 31 August 2009 - 19:08
sueincc
I will assume that you are talking to me. Even so I am bewildered by your logical conclusion. Let me ask you; do you know what is the short definition of socialism?
Prager(Hans)

by sueincc on 31 August 2009 - 19:08

by raymond on 31 August 2009 - 20:08
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top