
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by raymond on 03 December 2009 - 15:12
by VomMarischal on 03 December 2009 - 15:12

by Psycht on 03 December 2009 - 16:12
I must have missed something - who left?
by alaman on 03 December 2009 - 16:12
I saw where the WDA posted on another site they had added around 9 new clubs right after the vote. Eisenberg announced he was pulling his club.
There are effects

by snajper69 on 03 December 2009 - 17:12
by TessJ10 on 03 December 2009 - 17:12
Then they are simply telling you a falsehood. CLUBS have left the organization, which means that more than just those two individuals have left; their club members can now not renew their USA memberships.
USA is probably trying to mitigate the number of departures since most of them are still current USA members and will simply let their USA memberships expire - IOW, now that their clubs are no longer with USA they won't be renewing, so technically USA can say no one else has resigned....most simply will be unable to renew because they now belong to clubs no longer USA clubs.

by sueincc on 03 December 2009 - 23:12
Tess I think you can belong to USA regardless of what organization the club belongs to. For example I belong to a DVG and a USA club. If the USA club I belong to were to quit USA and become WDA, I can still remain a USA member, I just can't join WDA - not a problem for me.
by Eric Eisenberg on 04 December 2009 - 00:12
Eric S. Eisenberg

by Bob-O on 04 December 2009 - 00:12
Essentially, I do not want to remain as a member of an organization whose executive board has chosen to operate without transparency; and clearly demonstrates that all members do not have a say regarding major decisions. Let them (not us anymore) have the club they want - no grief from me. If they truely suffer - so be it. It they do an about-face - too late. I'm finished with them.
Sincerely,
Bob-O
by Schznd on 04 December 2009 - 02:12
j
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top