This is a placeholder text
Group text
by George the Retard on 24 January 2010 - 16:01
yeah lets just carpet bomb everything that should help.
maggie why didnt your great president attack russia or china.
gtr
maggie why didnt your great president attack russia or china.
gtr
by Keith Grossman on 24 January 2010 - 17:01
"So Keith -- You think Saddam was a "good Dictator" ??? Whew !!"
I didn't say that but what business it that of ours and why should I be comfortable with bombing the hell out of a country that was never a threat to us and then spending trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayers' hard earned dollars to rebuild it? Here:s a clue: Saudi Arabia is not a democracy and their government is based on a strict interpretation of Islam. They have WMD's; we sell them to them...they buy more arms than any other country in the world. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. Why are we attacking Iraq insted of Saudi Arabia again?
"Regarding the Source -- news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100121/pl_bloomberg/a8uii1bcrdmy"
Did you read past the headline? What it really says is that 77% of Bloomberg subscribers don't have confidence in Obama. I would submit that any investor following Bloomberg, who lost money during the stock market boom in the 90's, is an idiot.
"War is War -- When we send troops to fight, they should be allowed to do just that without being hindered by being PC on "collateral damage." Why do you think the Terrorists hide among the general population and behind the skirts of women and little kids and in their mosques. They KNOW the U.S. tries to minimize the damage to innocents. Get real Keith !! "
When you have served in the military, you come and talk to me about the rules of engagement. The United States cannot simultaneously hold ourselves up as defenders of human rights and resort to the same tactics that other, lesser forces employ and to suggest that we should is an insult to every man or woman who has ever honorably served this country in uniform. If we abandon our principles, the terrorists have won.
I didn't say that but what business it that of ours and why should I be comfortable with bombing the hell out of a country that was never a threat to us and then spending trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayers' hard earned dollars to rebuild it? Here:s a clue: Saudi Arabia is not a democracy and their government is based on a strict interpretation of Islam. They have WMD's; we sell them to them...they buy more arms than any other country in the world. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis. Why are we attacking Iraq insted of Saudi Arabia again?
"Regarding the Source -- news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100121/pl_bloomberg/a8uii1bcrdmy"
Did you read past the headline? What it really says is that 77% of Bloomberg subscribers don't have confidence in Obama. I would submit that any investor following Bloomberg, who lost money during the stock market boom in the 90's, is an idiot.
"War is War -- When we send troops to fight, they should be allowed to do just that without being hindered by being PC on "collateral damage." Why do you think the Terrorists hide among the general population and behind the skirts of women and little kids and in their mosques. They KNOW the U.S. tries to minimize the damage to innocents. Get real Keith !! "
When you have served in the military, you come and talk to me about the rules of engagement. The United States cannot simultaneously hold ourselves up as defenders of human rights and resort to the same tactics that other, lesser forces employ and to suggest that we should is an insult to every man or woman who has ever honorably served this country in uniform. If we abandon our principles, the terrorists have won.
by Two Moons on 24 January 2010 - 17:01
If we abandon our principles the terrorists have won.
Maybe we should examine a few of our principles.
Terrorists have already won more than once.
It all goes back to who you elect to hold public office to represent you.
And how they go about that task.
Depends on who stands up for whats really right and demands representation.
None of this really matters, whats coming is beyond control now.
Somewhere in all this chaos there is a plan, this plan was not designed to serve us or them.
Figure out who it does serve.
Maybe we should examine a few of our principles.
Terrorists have already won more than once.
It all goes back to who you elect to hold public office to represent you.
And how they go about that task.
Depends on who stands up for whats really right and demands representation.
None of this really matters, whats coming is beyond control now.
Somewhere in all this chaos there is a plan, this plan was not designed to serve us or them.
Figure out who it does serve.
by rainforestscouts on 24 January 2010 - 20:01
Keith,
Why not use them? Simple. He knew he could not win militarily against the US even with WMDs. However, he also had first hand experience with the US coming in and stopping short of unseating him. Imagine the great victory it would have been for him in the eyes of the world if the US had come in as before and not overthrown him. I don't think he ever thought it was going to come to where it is. In fact, I think it is a great posthumous victory for him even now as people such as yourself are now questioning whether it is America that is evil. I guess you can presume to know more than the Iraqi general in the link I posted. Are you CIA? As for him being to hobbled by embargo, please go back and read what I posted earlier about oil for food and the asprin factory. By previous administration, are you referring to the Bush or the Clinton administration? Both made references to his WMDs during their respective tenures.
Why did he not just comply with UN 1441?
Why not use them? Simple. He knew he could not win militarily against the US even with WMDs. However, he also had first hand experience with the US coming in and stopping short of unseating him. Imagine the great victory it would have been for him in the eyes of the world if the US had come in as before and not overthrown him. I don't think he ever thought it was going to come to where it is. In fact, I think it is a great posthumous victory for him even now as people such as yourself are now questioning whether it is America that is evil. I guess you can presume to know more than the Iraqi general in the link I posted. Are you CIA? As for him being to hobbled by embargo, please go back and read what I posted earlier about oil for food and the asprin factory. By previous administration, are you referring to the Bush or the Clinton administration? Both made references to his WMDs during their respective tenures.
Why did he not just comply with UN 1441?
by raymond on 24 January 2010 - 20:01
Iraq was a puppet regime used by the united states to combat the iranians! The us gave sold or supplied Iraq with all the military hardware they needed to fight off the iranians! Wake up twits! When the iranian Iraquis realized they were being used by america and russia in a no win war they stopped killing each other1 When america stopped aid ing Iraq asddam started to play hard ball! America supplied him with his WMD"s and all you twits know it! Who in heck was sellig saddam his big cannon??? Germany! with the help of the cia! The invasion of Iraq was nothing more than power projection to safeguard oil supplies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Afganistan is nothing but the same! So how can we persuade the stupid americans to tell congress to go to war1 Ohh we attack the wtc and pentagon and another plane to nowhere! then the stupid frightened americans will say beat em up george! Now the idiot Obama wants to give all these terrrorosts civil rights and citizenship! well this mass election will quiten those stupid americans down for awhile!!! go get em barak!
by MaggieMae on 24 January 2010 - 21:01
Keith -- your post sounds as if it were taken straight from the "talking points" of a Liberal. While our troops get killed, just think how we can "Proudly" point to our Rules and Moral High Ground -- B.S. !!!
by MaggieMae on 24 January 2010 - 21:01
Ohh we attack the wtc and pentagon and another plane to nowhere! then the stupid frightened americans will say beat em up george! Now the idiot Obama wants to give all these terrrorosts civil rights and citizenship! well this mass election will quiten those stupid americans down for awhile!!! go get em barak!
--------------------------
Raymond -- you are soooooo wrong about 9-11. Why are you so vulnerable and fall for the lunatic "conspiracy" theories? That really does surprise me about you. You are so open/vulnerable to believing pathetic, deranged B.S. Strange, very strange.......
--------------------------
Raymond -- you are soooooo wrong about 9-11. Why are you so vulnerable and fall for the lunatic "conspiracy" theories? That really does surprise me about you. You are so open/vulnerable to believing pathetic, deranged B.S. Strange, very strange.......
by Ninja181 on 24 January 2010 - 21:01
"Who in heck was sellig saddam his big cannon??? Germany!"
No Raymond it was not Germany. It was Dr. Gerald Bull from Quebec Canada, my wife at one time worked for Dr. Bull. It was called Project Babylon "supergun".
Dr. Bull was later assasinated by the Israelis in Belgium.
No Raymond it was not Germany. It was Dr. Gerald Bull from Quebec Canada, my wife at one time worked for Dr. Bull. It was called Project Babylon "supergun".
Dr. Bull was later assasinated by the Israelis in Belgium.
by MaggieMae on 24 January 2010 - 21:01
Keith -- have you actually been in combat?
by raymond on 24 January 2010 - 21:01
No maggie I am well aware of the characteristics of metal fatigue and explosives! The physics of the collapse do not and will never add up! to many variable left unanswered! Those two buildings could not and would not have fallen as they did with out mans intervention! the odds are astronomical and video after video shows to many inconsistencies! Jet fuel does not burn at a temp high enough to weaken steel! No way no how ! those buildings were engineered with the possibility of air crashes in mind! To many structural engineers dismissed and murdered because of their findings! Hey why not view the live footage of wtc 3 collapsing as a picture perfect implosion and it was not even hit by an airplane of suffer from extensive fire damage1 And there have been far to many buildings lie wtc burn for days and not collapse! Maggie if it smells like a skunk it is a skunk1 Aside fro mall crime scene investigation procedures being violated!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top