
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by rainforestscouts on 23 January 2010 - 22:01
What ever happened to DR?
RFS
by George the Retard on 23 January 2010 - 22:01
tell us how much you love the u.n.
you can bring them up to defend your lover george but lets hear what you honestly think of the u.n.
gtr
by George the Retard on 23 January 2010 - 22:01
gtr

by Keith Grossman on 23 January 2010 - 22:01
Know where he got them? From us.
"Don't worry. It's probably in Syria now."
You've made the claim a couple of times now that the WMD's could have been moved to Syria so let's consider that possibility logically. Why would Saddam have done so? Was he saving them for something bigger than an all-out, full scale military invasion of his country?

by MaggieMae on 23 January 2010 - 23:01
Keith, I read that 77% of Investors say that Obama is very bad for Businesses. Since you are a Businessman.........
------------------
We have killed a lot of Terrorists in Iraq....and that is Good !!!
Yes, the War could have been over a long time ago (perhaps in 6 months) if the U.S. wouldn't concern themselves about collateral damage.
The 100,000 Iraqis killed -- the majority were killed by Suicide Bombers -- not the U.S.
Ulli and "Tard" -- have you ever served in the Military?

by rainforestscouts on 24 January 2010 - 00:01
As to where Saddam got his WMDs, please see my above post concerning acting in the present tense.
Why Syria? Dunno. Because the enemy of my enemy is my friend, mayhaps.
GTRtR,
Since you brought up the whole environmental thing, I was wondering... and Ulli, you feel free to jump in on this one. How do you feel about the illegal war on capitalism that is being waged by the current administration through proposed cap and trade legislation. It is after all based on, not just unprovable, but provably falsified evidence, is it not?
RFS

by raymond on 24 January 2010 - 15:01

by Keith Grossman on 24 January 2010 - 16:01
Source?
"We have killed a lot of Terrorists in Iraq....and that is Good !!!"
We killed people who were defending their country with whatever means they had available. If someone attacks the U.S., we retaliate because they're wrong. If the U.S. attacks someone else and they retaliate, they're still wrong. If we've accomplished anythin in Iraq, it's creating more terrorists.
"The 100,000 Iraqis killed -- the majority were killed by Suicide Bombers -- not the U.S."
If that were true, and it's not, we are at least culpable for having created the situation in which these people are allowed to operate.

by Keith Grossman on 24 January 2010 - 16:01
Not why Syria, RFS, why hide the weapons at all instead of using them? I would submit that there is no situation ever faced by Saddam as dire as our invasion of his country. Had he had WMD's, he would have used them. In the first gulf war, they couldn't even hit us with a scud missile from across the street. It is ridiculous to suggest that between then and the initiation of this conflict, a country with few resources and under constant embargo could have developed or acquired the sophisticated weaponry the previous administration claimed they had.

by MaggieMae on 24 January 2010 - 16:01
Regarding the Source -- news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20100121/pl_bloomberg/a8uii1bcrdmy
That is just ONE of many sources -- it is all over the Net
War is War -- When we send troops to fight, they should be allowed to do just that without being hindered by being PC on "collateral damage." Why do you think the Terrorists hide among the general population and behind the skirts of women and little kids and in their mosques. They KNOW the U.S. tries to minimize the damage to innocents. Get real Keith !!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top