
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Videx on 23 January 2009 - 11:01
Kafferdog: You really need to avoid comments which are not relevent to the subject. Your last comment is stereotypical criticism of Show dogs. Simply start another thread and TITLE it, Criticism of GSD Show Dogs then all the assumptions, inaccuracies, and downright lies, etc. can be posted there. Another thread Criticism of Working Dogs would certainly follow. then all the "children" could have a field day or week or month.

by Videx on 23 January 2009 - 11:01
Many comments here are NOTHING to do with the subject of the thread, it appears that many do not read the posts, or understand them, they jump in ill prepared and shoot from the hip, missing the target by miles. They make stereotypical diversionary comments all too typical from working dog people on show dogs. Precisely the waffle and assumptions routinely spewed forth on this site by some 'self proclaimed' working people. The regularly repeated rumours, mainly inaccurate, or based on wishful thinking and even outright lies, and frequently repeated because they appeal to the MOST BASIC instincts of the human (un)competitive minds.

by Kaffirdog on 23 January 2009 - 11:01
Margaret N-J
by sardonix on 23 January 2009 - 11:01
For as much as working ability is very important in the German Shepherd Breed, CONFORMATION is also extremely important.
For as much as conformation is important in the German Shepherd Breed, WORKING ABILITY is also extremely important.

by Videx on 23 January 2009 - 11:01

by Videx on 23 January 2009 - 11:01
sardonix: EXTREMELY well put.

by pod on 23 January 2009 - 11:01
David, the criticism of show dogs is so very vital to this discussion if you are proposing that this conformation assessment is performed by show judges. It is abundantly clear why working enthusiasts would not want their dogs to conform to the modern day show winner type.
You conveniently avoid all questions that refer to the interpretation of the standard. The back and topline.... the clauses in both UK and FCI standards referring to these do not describe the modern day show winner. It is actually the working type that generally conforms most closely to both standards. If a reform of constructional type is necessary, it certainly isn't within the working type bloodlines.
by jennie on 23 January 2009 - 12:01
the core of the problem is that you and many showpeople probably don´t like the conformation that makes the soundest working GSD, so if the working GSD are supposed to look like the typical showdog of course people are going to laugh at this. Can someone tell me what is wrong with the conformation with a sqaure build and straight back, you know the types of GSDs that was favoured before the split between work and show and that you can find in many working GSDs of today?

by funky munky on 23 January 2009 - 13:01
by reason on 23 January 2009 - 13:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top