Sarah Palin on SNL tonight - Page 11

Komrade Hodie,

I said the same things your friend said, I just changed some of the words to point out what you just made obvious also. They were stereotypes.....liberals use them to their advantage and if someone ever uses them otherwise suddenly....their bigots! Racists! Or even worse....Bush supporters! Both of you have done a great job of proving my point.

And baby, I haven't answered your question, because unlike those poor kids who have to live under your liberal thumb, I don't care what you think of me and I don't answer to your ass.

Oh, and since you guys like your facts! How's this one?
You stated that in whatever experience you had that at least half the shoplifters were white. Well, according to this site only 4.1 % of the population in Colorado is black. So, 95.9% committed half, and 4.1% committed the others.....hmmmmm
You should have your detainees debate that one in the re-education camp.

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/08000.html

 seriously,

You are an idiot. And a bigot. Do you hate only blacks, or is it just Obama? You can't answer anything, even to yourself. I could give a flying %^^# what you think. And no, nothing I said remotely resembles anything others here said.

You have no integrity or courage. No wonder the country is where it is. 

Get used to it. There is change coming, and your next President will be a black man, whether you like it or not. 

And RPK, deep down, I know you are a good egg too!

God forbid that anyone has an opinion contrary to the Great Obama's, for surely they are a racist!

Hodie,

  I do not know who you think you are, but I get the impression that you a fat, old woman who has nothing better to do than sit by her computer all day.  Your arrogance and self-rightousness are over-whelming.  If your business partner was a halfway decent parent they would not let you see their children, much less talk to them. 

  When you get tired of calling everyone a racist and want to discuss issues let me know.  However, be aware that I may take awhile to respond as I have actual responsibilities including a job, spouse, and children; unlike some who seemingly have the ability to sit in front of the computer all day typing on the PDB.

Seriously if you believe that your bigoted statement about an entire race of people, a minority  that  suffered persecution solely for the color of their skin  for too many years, is somehow equal to what Blitzen said about the KKK and skinheads, two organizations born out of fear and hatred of minorities, who's function is to hate people because of the color of their skin   then you truly are either very naive or in fact are prejudiced.

If the election were held today, Obama would win by a landslide the likes of which have never been seen in this country.  So it's understandable that McCain/Palin supporters are bitter and afraid.  What is very telling is the fact that instead of discussing issues, your side insists on screaming  about non-issues.  Why - because you can't win on the issues.  You folks need to get a clue, people don't scare like they used to, Bush lied and cried wolf once too often.

You can't fix stupid..............

I don't know what is more scary, the stuff you try to pawn off, or that you actually believe this stuff

, zdog.

McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, Obama in the USA.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_USA.html

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/28/america/28mccain.php

Re all those "admissions" by Barak Obama and the DNC on the website provided by Southern Belle, what Berg, who filed the lawsuit, essentially concludes admission by Obama and the DNC if Berg's allegations in the suit are ignored.

The reality is that if there were any substance to these allegations, the JUDGE would demand responses which cannot be ignored.

Anyone can file a civil lawsuit and make allegations - so this is just a form of "swift-boating" by the right-wing nuts to try and get traction against Obama by spreading rumors and innuendo. Let's face it if there were any doubt about where Obama was born, it would have been used by the Hillary campaign during the primaries and certainly by the McCain campaign as they find themselves against the wall. Why go after the Ayers connection which is a totally flimsy argument - if they can just invalidate Obama's candidacy for president because it does not comply with the Constitution.

Southern Belle...Newsflash

Our nation (USA), under Presidente Boosh & the Neo CONS, has already Collapsed. You just havent realized it yet.

Peace Out!

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/18/IN5C13H0J5.DTL

Most Americans have one eye on the nation's financial crises and the other on the presidential election. And they are asking themselves, "Is John McCain or Barack Obama, the Democrats or the Republicans, better for the economic health of the country as well as for my own financial well-being?" That is the defining question of this election.

A businessman who voted for George Bush twice, and Bill Clinton in '96, told me, "Barack Obama sounds really impressive, and I have to admit that the goals of his social programs - particularly health care, education and the environment - seem good. But I'm worried the Democrats can't manage the economy as well, and they'll get into my wallet."

This sentiment is not rare. In past elections, pollsters have found that many voters believe that the Republicans do better with the economy. But is it true?

Let's look at the record.

During the 20th century, the Dow Jones industrial average rose 7.3 percent per year on average under Republican presidents. Under Democrats, it rose 10.3 percent - which means that investors gained a whopping 41 percent more. And the stock market declined further during George Bush's two terms.

Moreover, according to research from Professor Larry Bartels of Princeton, real middle class wage growth is double when a Democrat is president, contrasted to that growth under a Republican president.

Since World War II, Democratic presidents have increased the national debt by an average of 3.7 percent per year, and Republican presidents have increased it an average of 10.1 percent. During the same time period, the unemployment rate was, on average, 4.8 percent under Democratic presidents; it was 6.3 percent under Republicans.

That's the historical record.

What about economic policies over the past 15 years? The Clinton-Gore administration presided over the longest peacetime economic expansion in our history. The national debt was reduced dramatically, the industrial sector boomed, wages grew and more Americans found jobs.

How has the Bush-Cheney team fared? In the past seven years, we have experienced the weakest job creation cycle since the Great Depression, record deficits, record household debt, a record bankruptcy rate and a substantial increase in poverty. We have gone from being the nation with the biggest budget surplus in history to becoming the nation with the largest deficit in history.

The Bush administration, supported by Republicans on Capitol Hill, pushed through a sweeping tax cut in 2001, under which the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans reaped 43 percent of the gain. In less than a year and a half, the federal government's 10-year projected budget surplus of $1.6 trillion had vanished. In 2000, we had a surplus of $236 billion. In 2004, we had a deficit of $413 billion. This dramatic reversal is the direct consequence of Bush's tax cuts - and McCain wants to pursue the same bankrupt policies.

Since the conventions, McCain and his surrogates have been pounding away at the Democrats, labeling them as the "tax and spend" party. Yet recent research has shown that more than 70 percent of our national debt was created by just three Republican presidents: Reagan and the two Bushes.

There's an old expression in Las Vegas, "Figures don't lie and liars figure."