PRICE CHECK on AISLE #1 PLEASE - Page 10

Wow.  With the racial slurs!

You made the comparison between a child being gay, and a child being a child molester.  We only compare things which are similar.  Since the discussion at hand was morality, we can only surmise that the referenced equality was to be one of moral fiber.  Thus, homosexuals and child molesters/murderers are of same moral fiber, in your summation.

Since you consider gay people to be "decent" people, you must also consider child molesters/murderers to be "decent" people.

I've turned my laptop upside down and Raymond's word still don't make sense.

Can we take up a collection and get him back on his meds?

Please?

Man for you people to be dog trainers or handlers you sure are stupoid! Let me spell it out for you! SP said that even if his son told him he was gay Sp said as long as it made his son happy so was sp happy and his sons actions would be acceptable as long as his son was happy! Now using the same parameters we insert the actions of child murder or necromancer! All morally unaceptable behavior are now aceptable because as long as the boy was happy so was SP! Morality is not contingent upon the happines of the person in question!  No twits the comparison was made of unacceptable behavior becoming acceptable contingent upon the perpetrators happiness!Hell any 1st year phy student can understand this!  If my son tells me he has had sexual intercourse with a same sex person and asks me if it is acceptable ! Will I base my conclusion upon his happiness in the act? My son is a murderer and is happy in the deed ! Will I base my conclusion upon his happiness???????NO

So if I choose to value that my child has say, autism, and appreciate their diversity and embrace their unique makeup, rather than say, try to use Electroshock therapy or brain surgery to correct it, that means I would also embrace my child having cancer, and would not try to save the child's life through surgery?

Mudwick,

There is no reasoning with a crazy person.

SP

Oh please AARon  disabilities that are uncontrollable are exclusive of this subjectand you damn well know it!  Oh Sp will you excuse me for violating your CIVIL RIGHTS?lol lol lol  You been violating mine for a long time my BROTHER OF ANOTHER COLOUR!!! If you aint man enough to get peed on then stop pissin on other folk!  civil rightsLOLOLOLOOLLOOLOOLLOOLLLLL 

Seriously, Raymond you are deranged to the point of being frightening.

If you do have a minister, pastor, priest, man of the cloth of some sort you might want to get off the computer and call to talk to him/her for your own peace of mind.

You missed my point.

I'm not comparing homosexuality with medical diseases.

I'm saying that being okay with one thing, does not equate being okay with another.
Being okay with autism, does not mean being okay with cancer.

Do you think being okay with autism is proof that I'd let my child die of cancer?

AARon listen real close! I will try one more time! If your acceptance of your childs behavior is based solely upon whether it makes him or her happy! You are in for a boat load of trouble! Example! If my son was found killing small animals and confessed to the deed but told me he found an immense amount of happiness while doing it I would not tell him well ok as long as it makes you happy I am happy! Acceptable or unacceptable behavior can not be based upon the pleasure it may or may not provide!Now if you wish to join the other gang bangers go right ahead! FHT tracker do you possibly have a degree that will justify your diagnosis?NO I thought not

No, my acceptance of my child's sexuality or gender identity would be based upon the fact that I have no objections to it.

Just like my acceptance of my child being autistic would be based upon the fact that I have no objections to it.  That doesn't mean that I'd accept cancer, as I have objections to my child having cancer.