koch would consider Hillary over the Don???? - Page 1

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/04/24/politics/charles-koch-hillary-clinton-2016/index.

 

Have  pigs started to fly???

 

I'm confused here, sign of the end times for sure? 

Koch= https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia-Pacific

And so it stands to reason he is for TPP, which Trump is against and Trump can't be bought. Hillery on the other hand...

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9757712

Clinton Not Tough On Trade

Hillary Clinton is not seen as someone who will fight against our country’s corporate-driven trade policies. In the most recent New York primary exit polls, for example, voters who self-describe as pro-trade voted for Clinton over Sanders 61 percent to 39 percent. In Michigan voters who feel trade takes away jobs voted for Sanders 56 percent to 41 percent.

 

Clinton has been hedging. For example, on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) she said, just before the first Democratic primary debate, “based on what I know so far, I can’t support this agreement.” But she also said, “I still believe in the goal of a strong and fair trade agreement in the Pacific as part of a broader strategy both at home and abroad, just as I did when I was secretary of state.”

 

Clinton has said she will not lobby her supporters to vote against TPP and other such corporate-dominated agreements. She has not said that TPP and other corporate-dominated trade supporters won’t be invited into her administration. She certainly will not demand that Obama withdraw TPP from consideration by Congress.

 

The result? Clinton has a credibility problem on trade. Almost no one believes her. (See “Chamber of Commerce Lobbyist Tom Donohue: Clinton Will Support TPP After Election.”) 

 

“Pro-trade” voters vote for her. “Pro-trade” donors continue to give the max to her campaign. In fact, this hedging has left the donor and corporate class believing she is on their side, that she supports the “free trade” agenda that has killed off so many jobs, factories, entire industries, entire regions and left us with enormous, humongous trade deficits year after year after year - while making a very few at the top wealthy beyond belief.

 

Clinton is hedging, leaving herself room to appeal to the donor and corporate class. But if Clinton “moves to the center” on trade after the convention, as business and donor community believes she will, she risks losing those voters who feel that these trade agreements have ruined their lives, their towns, their regions and their country.

 

Will they believe she is against these trade deals? Or will they turn to Trump?

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/what-is-ttip-and-six-reasons-why-the-answer-should-scare-you-9779688.html

Not just koch supporting the hag, because she is going to carry on barry's agendas, ttip being the biggest.

Trump cant be bought, lmfao. Says who?

Not sure why the article describes their words as "kind". Seems to me they said the same thing to both party candidates...

"We would have to believe her actions would be quite different than her rhetoric. Let me put it that way,"

Then:

"But on some of the Republican candidates we would -- before we could support them, we'd have to believe their actions will be quite different than the rhetoric we've heard so far."

Sounds like the Libertarian brothers Koch are fence sitting more than anything. So, the pigs are safely still, wallowing in the mud.

If one watched the interview, one would hear koch snicker as he repeated the statement towards the repubs.
As for buying trump, I would think the Kochs have approached him regarding buying his favors. Jmo.

Trump can be bought and IMO he is easier to buy because he is all about himself and his money. He is in the mobs back pocket, already. Who in their right mind would even listen, repeat or trust anything the Koch's have to say???

Because they wield power over all us peasants?