
This is a placeholder text
Group text

This is a placeholder text
Group text

This is a placeholder text
Group text

This is a placeholder text
Group text
I only know what I saw in the videos. They didn't show 155 dogs. They showed maybe 20 dogs. The 20 dogs they showed, were very clearly in good weight, good shape, well-groomed, in good coat and in good spirits. They showed one paw that looked a little dirty when they mentioned "living in their own feces" etc. Toenails looked a little long. But, overall healthy bright dogs in good weight and good condition. That's what I saw in this report about the horrible puppy mill whose dogs were seized. So my conclusion could only be that the conditions they were living in must have been terrible indeed. 155 dogs living together in a small area (converted attic? though they said "only" 80 of them were living in the attic) must have been terrible enough to seize the dogs. Can't dispute that - but I must dispute the statements of "mistreatment" because the dogs they showed looked fine to me. Obviously someone was feeding and caring for them. Maybe there were others that were skin and bones, missing hair, infections and feces coating their bodies. If so, they should have showed those dogs in their report, if they wanted sympathy from people who might support their case. As it is, if this is the evidence they have that the dogs were mistreated/abused/neglected - they shouldn't call anyone like me to defend their case - I would say what I see in front of me - healthy clean well-kept dogs in good weight and condition that were not apparently mistreated. Watch the videos yourself, they are right there to see. Do you see any mistreated abused skinny fearful unhealthy dirty dogs? I didn't.
molly
So, Mystere is the one crying WOLF,,,When there is no wolf,,Is that What you are saying??
It Is or it ain't, Which is it?????
watch the video and make your own conclusions, that's what I did. No, I do not think the dogs were abused. If they were kept in crowded unsanitary conditions that is reason enough to seize them, glad they did and hope they now find better homes. But that doesn't mean their owner didn't feed them (obvious to me he fed them just fine), abused them, mistreated them or did not take proper care of their needs - except apparently for their housing, which was unsuitable enough to have them seized. Watch the videos, look at the dogs and make your own decisions. Mystery is only reporting the news and providing a link to watch - seizure of 155 dogs is reason enough to cry foul. Everyone who cares about dogs should be concerned about the welfare of others. I myself take in rescue dogs on a regular basis and do what I can to help when I can.
molly
Obviously truegrit and kitkat are the same person.
Ya think? :-)
To anyone actually interested in the TOPIC, please follow the link regarding the seizure of 155 dogs. I haven't and will not bother to respond to individuals who display "MPD" tendencies. Many of the dogs are too ill for adoption, others have medical problems that will impact adoptability.
Personally, I am glad that the video does not highlight the very worst cases, as that only gives PETA and the other AR radicals a leg up.
I'm sure the Snohomish county officials will use this to further their mandetory spay/neuter bill they keep trying to pass. I am glad this was shut down and the dogs removed.
What is it with these 2 sisters if they even are 2 people? Wuzzup and kitkat both spell terrible and go nutter every once in awhile. MPD, Bipolar or both?
Leave me out of this shit.I saw your spelling was off also 4 pack when the database went wacko last week .Your spell check must has been out to lunch, I'm not Kitkat she 's not me and shes not true grit.You just failed the private dick test.
Riiight! Because everybody rants like a nutjob and puts,,,, every few sentences instead of ....
So what, I misspelled a few words or hit the wrong key, I have long nails, but at least I go back and fix it if I re read my post. Thnak God for owner edit.
Contact information
Disclaimer
Privacy Statement
Copyright Information
Terms of Service
Cookie policy
↑ Back to top