
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GSD Admin on 27 August 2016 - 14:08
by Noitsyou on 27 August 2016 - 14:08
by joanro on 27 August 2016 - 14:08

by GSD Admin on 27 August 2016 - 15:08
You are obviously delusional. Imagine Breitbart using a Muslims house as their main business location, when all they do is rail against Muslims and support Trumps call to lock out Muslims from entering the US. And you can't see the irony in that and instead would rather call 2 people you know damn well aren't racist, racists. You seriously need help. The republican party is a wasteland and it gets worse everyday. They will not fund help to fight Zika unless they can de-fund planned parenthood while Americans and unborn babies are affected by Zika. SMH. Come on republican supporters step up and pressure your reps to get off their asses and fund Zika testing and outreach. American babies are dying and being born with severe birth defects.
by joanro on 27 August 2016 - 15:08
That she will outlaw freedom of thought, using the only police she supports...the 'thought police'...
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/27/university-chicago-rebels-pc-thought-police
by Noitsyou on 27 August 2016 - 22:08

by Prager on 27 August 2016 - 23:08
Hundmuter I am fully aware of all information . But you can spin it anyway you want it and adding historical details does not change anything. Hitler was not elected to be chancellor but he was appointed to be chancellor by Hindenberg, while you claimed that he was elected. If he de facto appointed "himslef"or if a figurehead of a president Hindenberg appointed him after burning of Reichstag is irrelevant to our discussion since appointed and not elected ( as you claimed) he was.

by GSD Admin on 28 August 2016 - 03:08

by Hundmutter on 28 August 2016 - 05:08
by beetree on 28 August 2016 - 15:08
@GSDAdmin. Forbes seems to think it is the Dems causing problems for Zika funding, looks like the Dems too, are taking out a page from the Book of Hillary with their own smoke and mirror tactics.
... A spat over money for Planned Parenthood isn’t what’s holding up federal funding to fight the Zika virus. Nor are Republicans, for that matter, the ones now standing in the way. Democrats are filibustering the funding bill largely because Republicans have insisted that the legislation be “paid for” with cuts in other areas of spending. Knowing it would be hard to justify blocking Zika funding over budget arcana, some critics have cast most of their protests under the guise of a fight over abortion.
... First, the Zika bill does not “ban” money from going to Planned Parenthood. It’s true that the measure wouldn’t earmark any funds for Planned Parenthood, but even President Obama’s original budget request didn’t line out any funding for the organization. ...
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top