
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by clc29 on 22 September 2014 - 03:09
Ibrahim,
What is a good score? A small number or a large number?
After watching some TV, working on a school project on the computer for the past 3 hours, I scored a 22.
by Ibrahim on 22 September 2014 - 04:09
A large number
by Ibrahim on 22 September 2014 - 04:09
I think a good score for adults should not be less than 25, and that is my guess. My wife's teacher mates at school ranged between 20 to 30, the younger make better scores, my daughter's mates ranged between 25 to 40

by Hundmutter on 22 September 2014 - 05:09
There is an age related element, I believe. I think the various parts of the eye deteriorate as we get
older, just as our hearing range decreases - it is well known that young people can pick up higher
pitched sounds than older adults. Remember those reports about the placing of White Noise speakers
at shops and street corners to stop kids from gathering and hanging around there and causing a
nuisance ? It was argued that sounds that would make it uncomfortable for the youth to listen to for
very long would not be a problem for everybody else because once you are past your twenties you
just can't hear them.

by windwalker18 on 22 September 2014 - 06:09
LMAO... I only scored 15 and that was with my glasses on!!
by Ibrahim on 22 September 2014 - 06:09
Windwalker, you and Bundishep are my best friends, welcome to the team of less than 20
by Ibrahim on 22 September 2014 - 06:09
Yes Hundmutter I too think age plays a major role

by Jyl on 22 September 2014 - 06:09
I just tried again and got a 26
by Ibrahim on 22 September 2014 - 06:09
Maybe practice makes one make better speed.
Well the test made me think how we see the colors of our dogs. Do we all see same color and same degree of color concentration?
For me I see black color of GSDs varies between show and work. Work GSD has a darker black or maybe I should say more true black which is close to very very dark charcoal. Show GSD black color is more close to very dark blue not really pure black. It could be my poor recognition of colors, I don't know, but I see a work GSd has more true black hairs while those of a show are not very true black, but more of very dark blue. What you think ?

by Hundmutter on 22 September 2014 - 07:09
The trouble with 'black' is that it generally has two phases, "red-black" and "blue-black". I have no way of knowing whether there's
a genetic explanation for this. From my own observations, the red-black features in black&gold saddle-pattern dogs which do not
have terribly strong pigmentation. Dogs that look blue-black to me at a young age still have their black hairs dark and shiny into
old age; dogs that show red-black tend to fade out / get increased 'bitch stripes' as they get older.
I don't find any great difference in working line dogs, but personally I have much less experience with the very dark ("black") Sables
we see on PDB. Those darker sables with which I have had contact seem to be equally prone to the red-black / blue-black thing,
in the colour tone of their, more individual, black hairs.
There are always more colours in a GSD coat that can be observed by really close scrutiny, but its a "grey area" (pun intended)
and varies from dog to dog. My bitch that I used to have was ostensibly a SL B&G; and her pigment never drastically faded;
but when you really looked at her, she had far more variations and colour-tones in her coat that my current dog, also a B&G SL,
does.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top