interesting facts, for believers. - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Shtal

by Shtal on 13 November 2012 - 07:11

My mission was / is to convert field into wheat and I have no interest wasting time with tares on this board, plus don't click my threads and you are free.

btw, misspelling my name is what I would expect from children of the devil,  which talks about in John Chapter 8:44


Shtal.

Shtal

by Shtal on 13 November 2012 - 09:11

Some people say hey I am smart because I believe in evolution and you folks are all dumb because you don’t believe in and I would resent that very much.
 
As far is limiting God, I am not the one who limits God, I think some people stuck on this idea that the Universe is 17 billions years old; people are the one who is limiting God.
 
Bible says in Psalms 81:12 and in Romans 1:24 and 26, Acts 7:42 and 2 Chronicles 30:7. God gave them up unto their own lusts.
God gives up on people when they choose not to believe in God. Some people don’t like God and in 2 Thes. 2:11 God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
And if you believe you came from a rock, you believe a lie, okay…
Evolution was discredit years ago by honest scientists, there is no evidence for it except things that been proving wrong, I don’t say you are particular a liar, but if you teaching those things in school that was been proving wrong, then you would be. Evolution is a dying theory an artificial life support, kept only alive from religious zealots. Evolution is dying religion, just like many fault teaching died horrible deaths over the years, evolution is no differ, the only reason people didn’t give up on this silly idea is because the only alterative is creation.

by beetree on 13 November 2012 - 14:11

Atheists are the last group to be steeped in discrimination that is still considered "politically correct".  Morality has been shown to have little to do with religiosity, so I'm curious as to why you would hold that opinion.
 

Travels, the above quote from your post again, misconstrues what is actually my opinion on this matter. I personally, have not given an opinion on this matter, only to have been dealing with theories in science and facts. The fact that a statistic exists, doesn't really mean much to me, if one is using the wrong statistic and still hoping to obtain an unbiased perception.

Why can I point to empathy? Well, first we have to agree that if we are going to make judgments on a population, in this case the sane criminals that for one reason or another got caught and are incarcerated, should not we be wanting to know what really allowed them to chuck "morality" out the window? We too, have to decide if that is what keeps most people in check for obeying laws or using "maps". "Maps" could include The Bible or religiosity, I think you used. Speaking hypothetically for discussion, only.

I know it is hard to resist kicking Shtal around because,
now, I do get you were talking to him not me, Moons, (I don't know about you but I get a lag time sometimes with the order of postings...and sometimes I respond when a post shows up before mine)... any way I digress.... I see no reason why "morality" can't be examined closer by believers or not. I am such a bad "believer" by all the zealot standards, really, I just find this micro topic the telling part, when it comes to differences between groups. 

And I don't mean the wheat cultivation thing per se, but it oddly does not exclude it if one were looking for a validation. I think Shtal uses that illustration or verse the wrong way, because it never provides him the results he is supposed to be seeking when he uses it, here.  And on your token, of course you know it doesn't matter to point it out to him; so it is like someone else said, I paraphrase: wordfight workout for whatever ails ......Roll eyes


by beetree on 13 November 2012 - 19:11

Wrong one, have to update later....oops...

This is the one.....



Shtal

by Shtal on 14 November 2012 - 03:11

Here is the video that explains what BabyEagle4U is talking about in other thread of my reply.

If you set the video time bar or slide the time to 6:20 and click play which also explains the Big Bang.



This gives good answer, just set slide bar at time 6:20 with mouse click.


THE COMPLETE ANSWER YOU WILL GET AT time bar 10:11 but play at 6:20

Shtal

by Shtal on 14 November 2012 - 03:11

GSDtravels wrote: Facts?  Is this what you call facts?  Well, that explains a lot!


LOL, If you play that video, yours is no better.

Shtal

by Shtal on 14 November 2012 - 04:11

That video talks about first law of thermodynamics, “Matter (and/or energy) cannot be created or destroyed”
It can only be changed and formed; well if matter cannot be created or destroyed then I have a problem, because everything is made out of matter, you are made out of matter and I made out of matter, everything is made out of matter. Then we have a question to ask? Where did matter come from? Ultimately there are two choices! Either - somebody made it or it made itself, there is no other choice. Evolutionist people were thinking for long time about this subject and they come up with theory about big bang.

Shtal

by Shtal on 14 November 2012 - 05:11

BabyEagle4U,


The link says The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is our best explanation for the fact of evolution. http://www.notjustatheory.com/index.html

Let me provide you with an answer what to say to GSDtravels,

Evolution Text book says and show a picture. Four wing fly, which by the way it cannot fly: And it says Normal fruit flies have two wings. This mutant has four. This rare mutation, like most mutations, is harmful. Then it says beneficial Mutations are the raw material for natural selection.
 
Oh no, hold on a minute, why don’t they show us an example of beneficial mutation?
 
Why would they tell us about good ones and don’t show us picture of it. “The Good one”
 
Do you know why they didn’t show us a good picture of a good mutation in a text book? Because nobody ever seen one. There was never been one beneficial mutation. And they say Evolution and Natural Selection go together. It says Natural selection causes evolution, that is a lie, natural selection, selects. It doesn’t create anything. Natural selection is not a creative force, okay!
Natural selection maybe stabilizing force, but its not a creative force, anybody with a half of brain could figure that out. Natural selection, cannot create any property, it can only select.
And text book says, Evolution by natural selection had occurred in just one year. No they are lying.
And it says natural selection can lead to evolution, that is a lie! Natural selection, selects, it doesn’t create a thing.

GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 14 November 2012 - 05:11

Shtal, you don't need a picture of what's alive and walking the Earth.  It's late, I'm tired, you're boingly predictable and I'm going to get some rest.  Sleep well.

GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 14 November 2012 - 05:11

Here ya go Shtal, as promised. Nitey nite!

Are mutations harmful?





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top