This is a placeholder text
Group text
by GSDtravels on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
beetree, you are dancing around the issue and you know it. And no, it's not my opinion, it's the law. And the Supreme Court has agreed time and time again.
by beetree on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
It is an option Felloffer, not a magic bullet. You get to stand there counting to 60 during the "moment of silence". Who the heck cares? The point is, insisting on an absolute zero tolerance re: GOD, in schools is an extreme. That is my point.
GSDTravels has no idea what she means when she says "common law". Handfasting is common law, too.
GSDTravels has no idea what she means when she says "common law". Handfasting is common law, too.
by beetree on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
I am not dancing around anything... I've made a half dozen posts trying to get a reasoned reply from you .....without a personal attack, preferably. Clearly stating and restating my POV. It still isn't any thing you want to acknowledge, LOL
by GSDtravels on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
Actually, you're starting to finally get it beetree, when I look back over your post. The laws were written to be progressive, not regressive. Women attained the right to vote when they challenged it. Blacks were granted freedom when it was brought to the courts. All forward progress, desinged into the law to progress us. They had those rights all along, they were upheld by the courts when challenged. Lightbulb going on yet?
by Ninja181 on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
Travels:
Many of the early settlers left their old countries because they were religiously persecuted, some were only allowed to worship one religion.
Our separation of church and state entails the rejection of an official, government-sanctioned creed rather than the obligatory erasure of references to God in civic life.
You should have known that.
Many of the early settlers left their old countries because they were religiously persecuted, some were only allowed to worship one religion.
Our separation of church and state entails the rejection of an official, government-sanctioned creed rather than the obligatory erasure of references to God in civic life.
You should have known that.
by GSDtravels on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
You tell me exactly what the implication is on that T-shirt beetree, be specific.
by GSDtravels on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
Common law is the precedent set in a case where the law is interpreted by the courts.
by Ninja181 on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
It's snowing like hell here. LOL
by Ninja181 on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
The imlications on the shirt mean:
Violence in schools will continue until the world moves from a materialist society to a spiritual one.
Violence in schools will continue until the world moves from a materialist society to a spiritual one.
by Ninja181 on 29 December 2012 - 21:12
The courts interpretations seem to change according to what political party appointed them.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top