This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Shtal on 22 December 2012 - 19:12
My dear fellofher,
That is when people go from observation to the interpretation of the observation and that is where the trouble starts.
Shtal.
That is when people go from observation to the interpretation of the observation and that is where the trouble starts.
Shtal.
by Shtal on 22 December 2012 - 19:12
GSDtravels wrote: Scientists have never pretended to have all of the answers
Let’s take a look at the science side of the Big Bang, because in all reality it is miserable science, what we see in the picture of the cosmologic explosion, and evolutionist say it when off roughly 3.4 seconds, everything radiated out into space and the space itself expanded, sounds great, sounds just like a very nice story book, but the only problem with this is GSDtravels: right from start, it violated two very fundamental law of science, you created matter and you gone from karaoke explosion into an order universe.
Shtal.
Let’s take a look at the science side of the Big Bang, because in all reality it is miserable science, what we see in the picture of the cosmologic explosion, and evolutionist say it when off roughly 3.4 seconds, everything radiated out into space and the space itself expanded, sounds great, sounds just like a very nice story book, but the only problem with this is GSDtravels: right from start, it violated two very fundamental law of science, you created matter and you gone from karaoke explosion into an order universe.
Shtal.
by Felloffher on 22 December 2012 - 19:12
Shtal,
There is nothing around us that would indicate the earth is not billions of years old.
There is nothing around us that would indicate the earth is not billions of years old.
by Shtal on 22 December 2012 - 20:12
by Felloffher on 22 December 2012 - 20:12
Shtal,
It's just easier that way for you isn't it?
It's just easier that way for you isn't it?
by GSDtravels on 22 December 2012 - 22:12
Shtal, you have very little understanding of science.
"right from start, it violated two very fundamental law of science, you created matter and you gone from karaoke explosion into an order universe".
Who said "I" created matter? Who said anybody created matter? No natural laws were broken Shtal.
"right from start, it violated two very fundamental law of science, you created matter and you gone from karaoke explosion into an order universe".
Who said "I" created matter? Who said anybody created matter? No natural laws were broken Shtal.
by Shtal on 22 December 2012 - 22:12
There is the problem with that GSDtravels, it’s kind of dumb to think is you can get an order universe from the explosion. If you can imagine this, if you took a grenade and throw it into your bedroom and blew it up, what will happen?
btw, you should know the laws of thermodynamics.
If you really analyze the Big Bang theory, it is miserable science.
Matter cannot be created or destroyed, then the Big Bang cannot have happened by its own power.
Fellofher,
If atheist like you haven’t noticed my remark about billions of years, then you wouldn’t jump the gun with your remark.
Shtal.
btw, you should know the laws of thermodynamics.
If you really analyze the Big Bang theory, it is miserable science.
Matter cannot be created or destroyed, then the Big Bang cannot have happened by its own power.
Fellofher,
If atheist like you haven’t noticed my remark about billions of years, then you wouldn’t jump the gun with your remark.
Shtal.
by Shtal on 22 December 2012 - 23:12
GSDtravels you telling me that everything just popped out of nothing at the beginning of time; All of the matter in space, time, was suddenly just came out of a small dot of condensed particles, but where all those particles did originally came from. Btw this theory of the Big Bang, the matter was so condensed that absolutely nothing could escape the gravity pull. So, how could it have exploded, or by other means expanded into what we now see as our universe?
by GSDtravels on 22 December 2012 - 23:12
Shtal, why are you asking me about the big bang? And who said I was an Atheist? I might be, but then, I might not be, does it matter?
Like I've said before, you could turn evolution on its head and disprove the big bang tomorrow. What would that prove? It would prove that they were wrong and guess what that would mean? Back to the drawing board. And if your drawing board is the Bible that's fine, but now you have to set out to prove it :)
Like I've said before, you could turn evolution on its head and disprove the big bang tomorrow. What would that prove? It would prove that they were wrong and guess what that would mean? Back to the drawing board. And if your drawing board is the Bible that's fine, but now you have to set out to prove it :)
by Shtal on 22 December 2012 - 23:12
Here is Good picture of your God, GSDtravels.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top