
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by yellowrose of Texas on 19 August 2012 - 00:08
WHERE IS THE STATEMENT that says..>WE the CONGRESS and ME THE PRES and my staff will cut spending on PRIVATE matters and wasting COMMITTE spending on all programs starting Sept 1..
NO while he makes speeches like today saying like teaseing a RAT with CHEESE//"we are just asking you earing over 250,000.00 to pay a tiny bit more" to help bring WHAT DOWN///
OK HOW ABOUT THESE APPLES and ORANGES>>..EXPLAIN this one and the 22 other trips using my tax dollars on 3 planes, and 600 employes to clean, serve his wife and kids and groom the DOG>.?????
Malia on break in Mexico
After driving the U.S. more deeply into debt than any other President,
this should make you shake your head. If George Bush's daughters or
Bill Clinton's daughter had done this, it would have been all over the
news and the voter's would have been calling for heads to roll 24/7.
But with the chosen one, you hear nothing on the major media.
Want to know where Obama's 13 year-old daughter went with 12 friends?
On "spring break" in Oaxaca Mexico , on your dime.
She took two jets, 12 friends and 25 secret service men.
A thirteen year-old? What the?
Why haven't you heard about it?
The Obama Administration has had the Secret Service scouring the web
ordering that any website mentioning this be taken down because letting
the travel plans out could have endangered the president's daughter's
security.
Nonsense, the "royal couple" just want to hide the way they are ripping
off the U.S. taxpayer. Only a few Canadian Web-sites still have it up.
(both below)
The Obama's are laughing at the "suckers" who are funding their
Imperial Lifestyle.
This trip cost more than most Americans make in their entire lifetimes
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/travel/Obama+daughter+spends+spring+break+Mexico/6323773/story.html
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/maliamexico.asp
SHE IS ONLY 13 YEARS OLD!!!
by RPKonig on 19 August 2012 - 01:08
Have you read Obama's book (Dreams from my father) Obama Sr believed in taxing the rich 100%. Would that do it for you? Currently the upper 10% pay upwards of 75% of all federal taxes collected.It is apparent that Barack shares his fathers dreams. Here is a well produced documentary http://2016themovie.com/ that I think you should go see!
by Blitzen on 19 August 2012 - 01:08
I have read that book. Don't recall Obama's saying that about his father, can you copy that here?
I don't think I'll see that film, but thanks for the suggestion. You are ducking the question - why doesn't he release those tax records so he can embarass Reid et al? Boy, he would have field day with that, don't ya think?
Of course I think millionaires should pay a higher rate than I do.
by RPKonig on 19 August 2012 - 01:08
I think there is enough above to draw my conclusion on Sr Obama's Tax rates for the "Rich". Odd is it not, that Father and Son share the same thoughts on the "Rich"?.....I mean his main platform is Romney being rich and taxing the rich more............You really ought to see the movie. Actually I hope everyone would see the movie!!
As for why he not releasing more tax records then he legally has to? I think he is getting mileage on the democrats for not talking about the REAL issues that effect America. Believe it or not Romney's taxes do not effect you or ........ Besides at this point it would be more like paying a ransom to a crook
For the record, Mitt Romney has released tax returns for the last two years, but hypocritically Reid, Pelosi and Wasserman have refused to release their tax records, which might shed light upon how they have increased their net worth by tens of millions of dollars while in Congress.
by Blitzen on 19 August 2012 - 02:08
by beetree on 19 August 2012 - 03:08
Just like Dick Blumenthal magically did increase his income! And then we add in Linda McMahon oh boy is this for real? Did I say I didn't like wrestling? LOL I can't get away from this stuff.

by yellowrose of Texas on 19 August 2012 - 04:08
Have you read the book "The Amateur" Edward Klein
YR
by Blitzen on 19 August 2012 - 11:08
by Blitzen on 19 August 2012 - 11:08

Bain is just chapter one in the Book of Romney
Republicans are desperate to declare Obama's attacks on Mitt's business background off-limits. But in the life of Romney, vulture capitalism is an inescapable theme
posted on May 21, 2012, at 12:00 PM

The real Mitt Romney is finally running for president — but not in his own first television spot, a superficial checklist of issues which provides no insight into who he is or what makes him tick. It's the Obama commercial on Bain and the destruction of GST Steel that starkly reveals the real Romney as a vulture capitalist. And this is just the beginning of what we will hear about Bain, and of a narrative arc that will position Romney as the candidate of the few, by the few, and for the few.
The Obama ad is so powerful because, like the Ted Kennedy ads in Romney's losing 1994 Senate race, the story is told not by a smoothly modulated professional narrator, but by working people whose jobs and lives were shredded so Mitt and his men could amass their millions. One of the workers voted for John McCain in 2008 and for George W. Bush before that. Now these authentic blue-collar voices, these Reagan Democrats, are talking directly to swing voters — to folks who could be brothers or sisters, friends or cousins — in the battleground industrial states. It's a different kind of political media — gritty, unslick, and therefore quite convincing.
My then-partner Tad Devine and I conceived and produced the Kennedy spots in 1994. They hit the Massachusetts airwaves with devastating force. In that landmark Republican year, Romney had a slight lead in September, but he swiftly fell in the polls and then melted down in a televised debate that outdrew the statewide audience for most Super Bowls. On Election Day, the boy from Bain lost in a landslide — by 18 points
by Blitzen on 19 August 2012 - 12:08
Game on..............
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top