Need balance on this board - Page 13

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

sueincc

by sueincc on 27 March 2011 - 18:03

sorry now I see what she's talking about.


MAINLYMAX

by MAINLYMAX on 27 March 2011 - 18:03

DD,

          Get some exercise....walk your dogs...

It is not trolls......it is one woman.....aginst 5 people and 2 lawyers.

I am here because of my life in dogs and achievements. read my face book.

 


by Donald Deluxe on 27 March 2011 - 18:03

Dogsand I walked this morning.  Now they are outside in the yard enjoying the day while I watch hoops.  

And it most certainly is about trolls.  This particular troll has disrupted this place for two years, but the revelation that it was collecting personal information to harm other posters here is simply too much to abide.


by Donald Deluxe on 27 March 2011 - 18:03

"sorry now I see what she's talking about."

 

Doesn't matter.  If I rob a bank today, I don't get to say "But Joe robbed it last year!" to defend my actions.


MAINLYMAX

by MAINLYMAX on 27 March 2011 - 18:03

DD

If you want me to help you with your most 2 used lines.... I can..... (rubber stamp it)

This is just about 95% of everything you have ever contributed.

 

LMAO.  When the going gets tough, ...... calls in the troll!

The only thing needing to get off of here - hopefully permanently - is the troll.

DFTT ..............

$185.00 please.


by Donald Deluxe on 27 March 2011 - 18:03

More avoidance of the real issue: the troll attempting to collect and divulge personal information to harm other posters.  

Simple question: do you wish to associate with that kind of person?  I don't.


sueincc

by sueincc on 27 March 2011 - 19:03

Exactly right, Donald Deluxe, I agree with you 100% and what's more,  Maggie and everyone else knows she's full of shit too.  I was looking for the thread where Maggie outed both Mystere and Hodie in the same post.  She provided both  their first and last names as well as the states they were living in, she was all too happy and Johnny on the Spot  to post the info the minute someone asked who they were.  

A normal person who wanted to be nice would have  sent Mystere and Hodie each a  PM directing them to the thread and post in question, so that Mystere and Hodie could have contacted the person who wanted to know who they really were, if they so desired.  But Maggie is not normal or nice.  She knew what she was doing was wrong, and it was reflected in the post with  her  nasty ass smug attitude.  This is just one more of the posts maggs has deleted.  Unfortunately for her it doesn't matter how many posts she erases, we remember and  her reputation as a low life liar goes before her.

It makes absolutely no difference that someone posted the information in 2008, the only reason I asked is because I didn't know what she was referring to.  I deleted my post because she had answered the question.

 

 

 


by beetree on 27 March 2011 - 19:03

Why Maggie gets a free pass, just isn't what you said before Max. I told you she was looking for dirt on me, but that is just ignored by you, because you hate lawyers! When you sweet talk me I hear bells in head (Alarms!) and now I know what that twinge between the shoulder blades is all about. So really Sue? Max has been using the same line on you, too! surprise Those damn spots on those big cats. Keep showing up all the time no matter what. 

 

Groan... MM & MM; the stroking has begun. Ugh.


sueincc

by sueincc on 27 March 2011 - 19:03

Personally I don't care whether or not Max likes Maggie, it makes no difference to me.  By the same token, Max just as you  are entitled to speak your opinion to your hearts content... you must understand, so is everyone else, regardless of whether or not we agree with one another, and regardless of whether you like it or not.


by Donald Deluxe on 27 March 2011 - 19:03

The anti-lawyer stuff doesn't bother me, beetree, it's just  a different way of avoiding the fundamental moral question I've posed.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top