
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Bob McKown on 16 April 2010 - 18:04
Again has anyone gotten her address called the local sheriff or rescue and asked for the place to be checked? that goes alot farther then typing about it?and if the mutitude of poster all did it I,m sure there would be a check!.
by beetree on 16 April 2010 - 18:04
I don't think anyone knows her new address. She was quite pleased with that. She's boarding dogs too, if you can imagine being a customer unawares of her true character and how she treats dogs, that's a real scary thought.

by Sock Puppet on 16 April 2010 - 19:04
Yes it has been done but why don't we just send her a pm and tell her they are on the way. Writing about her only helps people in the future, when she decides to pop up again.
Bob I remember when the last Hesler ordeal went down you were pretty upset and damn straight you should of been so some people are directly affected like you were then.
Bob I remember when the last Hesler ordeal went down you were pretty upset and damn straight you should of been so some people are directly affected like you were then.
by Bob McKown on 16 April 2010 - 19:04
I agree, but i did,nt post to 8,9,10 pages and get 3 posts, pulled over it. And the lady that started that thread got her dog back (with some well placed pressure) and the 2 dead dogs post also ended. Folks my last word to this post is "at some point you have to be willing to really do something about it more then post.
I hope this works out well for you all and not so well for her.
I hope this works out well for you all and not so well for her.
by wrestleman on 16 April 2010 - 19:04
Facts folks facts. She was convicted of felony animal abuse read about the conditions. Whether she plead or not is not relevant. She also lost a kennel full of dogs in early 90's to lightening she stated to me years ago. That maybe not her fault, to keep dogs in crap so deep and living 24-7 in airline crates is more than criminal. I shovel my dogs crap anytime I see a pile, why couldn't she. Who knows why thread was removed, way too many on here are removed.
The worst part of this is that she is still allowed to have dogs and I think she even mentioned breeding them in one of her post and someone on here said she boards dogs.....that is where the real tragedy of this lies is that after all she has done she still is allowed animals...
Other than that everyone have a great weekend at training this weekend. I am tracking all weekend, finally nice weather and grass so got to use it
The worst part of this is that she is still allowed to have dogs and I think she even mentioned breeding them in one of her post and someone on here said she boards dogs.....that is where the real tragedy of this lies is that after all she has done she still is allowed animals...
Other than that everyone have a great weekend at training this weekend. I am tracking all weekend, finally nice weather and grass so got to use it

by LAVK-9 on 16 April 2010 - 19:04
Exactly Wrestleman, facts are facts.One can delete a thread (most likely the guilty party) but you can't delete the facts.

by Sock Puppet on 16 April 2010 - 19:04
Lauren,
She did not have it deleted it was the regular troll group that is responsible. They do not care about facts they have their own agenda. Right trolls.
She did not have it deleted it was the regular troll group that is responsible. They do not care about facts they have their own agenda. Right trolls.

by LAVK-9 on 16 April 2010 - 21:04
Ahhh of course the thread trolls. How could I forget about them....well I try to at least but they are like weeds.You just can't get rid of them.

by GSDSRULE on 16 April 2010 - 21:04
I don't think anyone knows her new address. She was quite pleased with that. She's boarding dogs too, if you can imagine being a customer unawares of her true character and how she treats dogs, that's a real scary thought.
http://www.whitepages.com/search/FindPerson?firstname_begins_with=1&firstname=janice&name=bartmess&where=ca
http://www.whitepages.com/search/FindPerson?firstname_begins_with=1&firstname=janice&name=bartmess&where=ca

by Psycht on 16 April 2010 - 21:04
In regards to there being no photographic "evidence" of the case being discussed her, that is not necessarily uncommon if the matter did not go to trial. Photographs taken of the dogs would be part of the case file and if not submitted as evidence in a hearing, it would not be published without permission of the court. In the cases that I have prosecuted there have been some that no photos are public due to not being admitted in court and there are other cases where I made sure that when I did the sentencing, I included photographs in my sentencing argument just so there would be photographs as part of the public record.
My suggestion is that if one wants to try to prevent this thread from being deleted, and/or subsequent threads regarding this subject, that it not turn into a "free for all". Simply state the information regarding the individual and ignore the individuals looking for an argument on the subject. Just my two cents worth.
My suggestion is that if one wants to try to prevent this thread from being deleted, and/or subsequent threads regarding this subject, that it not turn into a "free for all". Simply state the information regarding the individual and ignore the individuals looking for an argument on the subject. Just my two cents worth.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top