
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by nonacona60 on 04 February 2011 - 22:02
Not being a smart-ss, but what is the point in the thread....Seems both ads contain the same information, and identify the dog the same way.....
Had a rough night and day so I am probably missing the entire point...Any help would be appreciated...
Had a rough night and day so I am probably missing the entire point...Any help would be appreciated...
by beetree on 04 February 2011 - 22:02
Well, in one photo he's a roach, in the other he is not. One is not resized properly. Could this be a refresh error or someone trying to be the everything dog to anyone? Maybe that will help with a directional nudge in coming to a point on this thread.
It's not just you being cranky Nona, don't be so hard on yourself!
It's not just you being cranky Nona, don't be so hard on yourself!


by nonacona60 on 04 February 2011 - 22:02
Thanks Bee, I thought I missed something....


by lovejags on 05 February 2011 - 03:02
I THINK THE EAR SET IS DIFFERENT ON BOTH DOGS
by phaedra on 05 February 2011 - 05:02
Here you go... ponder away!



by PowerHaus on 05 February 2011 - 05:02
I don't think it is the same...look at the hair on the underbelly. On one the black bleeds down to the underbelly and not on the other and the back of the neck is different on each dog.
Just my opinion though.
Vickie
Just my opinion though.
Vickie

by Red Sable on 05 February 2011 - 18:02
Doesn't look like the same dog to me. Vickie is right about the black, also, the dog in the bottom pic has more of a stop, and more rear angulation- at least in those pics. Sturdier too.

by clc29 on 05 February 2011 - 19:02
Is this a game? Do we get a prize if we guess right?
I think Vickie is right. I noticed the hair on the first pic but could not tell if the difference was due to the poor pic. Also, to me the muzzle, coat color on the neck and ear shape look slightly different (angle of the head taken into consideration).

I think Vickie is right. I noticed the hair on the first pic but could not tell if the difference was due to the poor pic. Also, to me the muzzle, coat color on the neck and ear shape look slightly different (angle of the head taken into consideration).
by triodegirl on 05 February 2011 - 20:02
Is the OP somehow suggesting the ad owner is being dishonest? If not, then what's the point? Boredom?

by VKGSDs on 05 February 2011 - 20:02
They look the same to me, at least I don't see anything that would jump out at me that they're not. Coloring, expression, size, angles, etc look the same to me. Lord knows I could put ny two pics of my dog side by side and no one would believe they were the same if this dog is not the same! The dog is not stacked the exact same, and his head is turned in one pic, so they are not going to be a carbon copy. Also do we know when the pics were taken? A dog is not going to look the exact same if he is a young dog still maturing (2 years vs. 2.5 or 3 years....). I do not put much weight in the every so slight differences in the neck and belly. Again these pics could be a year apart. Also, it's possible one or both photos were re-touched. It is common to clean up these areas. I would not be surprised if at least the first photo was re-touched, especially that area on the underline and the neck.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top