
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Prager on 18 April 2010 - 17:04
OK but what are you going to do, or feel like, when these people are going to be banned from owning Pitt or Rott,... will then decide that they will use for their protection, GSD, Boxer, Airdeil, Labrador.............And then the government in their infinite wisdom is going to ban these breeds. You breed! What ever that breed is.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
Prager Hans
by rainforestscouts on 18 April 2010 - 17:04
What ever happened to DR?
RFS

by LAVK-9 on 18 April 2010 - 17:04

by Bhaugh on 18 April 2010 - 19:04
A friend of mine the other day said that he saw Tibetan mastiff puppies and he was thinking of getting one. Here is a guy with limited dog know how thinking of getting a dog that is known to be aggressive and not a very good house pet with 4 kids and a wife. EEEKKK thats a bite waiting to happen.
Ive heard of similar stories about American Bulldogs unfortunately. Im not surprised.
by Micky D on 19 April 2010 - 01:04
Hans wrote:
"3. If British (and others) would not ban all weapons for self defense then people would not have to look for other means to defend themselves. Like dogs. To have properly trained dog and maintain such dog's training and be able to properly handle such is much more difficult then use of other weapons for self defense. Here is a proof that you can not make society safer by banning "tools" used for defense. What needs to be controlled is an improper behavior. And there should be time spend on educational training videos and awarness of what makes dog tik rather then spend it on BBC's imbecilic video like this. Now they are going to ban Pit bulls, Rotts, GSDs, ....... This is so wrong. And does no good, as it is obvious to all sane people."
I was particularly bothered by the 2 young girls in the video, who both related how their dogs made them safe. The dogs in question were busily raging at each other during the conversation oblivious to any human around them, including the owners, who were yelling "no" without any effect whatsoever. I felt sympathy for the 2 youngsters who feel under threat when they go out in public. That's no way to spend your teen years.
Young teenagers with big, aggressive dogs are an accident waiting to happen. It's appalling to see the number of large, dog aggressive canines in the hands of clueless teens in that video. I agree with Hans. When you take away a population's ability to protect itself from attackers, it's not at all surprising that people will grasp at anything they can use as a weapon or as a means of protection.
by bazza on 19 April 2010 - 07:04

by Prager on 19 April 2010 - 15:04
Why do they have to be clue less???? I know many teenagers who are not clueless. People join military as teenagers. Are they clueless? Or drive cars? ......Train them how to use a weapon, do not ban it. Responsible weapons ownership leads to polite society in general and then these girls would not have as much fear. When Australia baned firearms then their crime rate with weapons went up 300%.
Rule No.:1Thugs will always have guns.
Here in Arizona is a girl who defended her self in London (GB) subway against rape with Swiss army knife and was charged by police there for assault with deadly weapon and possession of a weapon with intention to use it. She was going to GB to face the trial where she could get many years (!!!!) in prison for that. I believe friends and family talked her out of it. You people in GB are, as far a self defense and responsible ownership of weapons goes, completely out in the left field. But if you like not to be able to defend your self that is OK with me.
Bazza here is a hypothetical . Picture this. Let say someone is raping and killing your family member (mother , daughter , sister, wife.....) would you like to be able to have and use a gun in their defense in that situation.
Please naswer that above question.....at least to yourself.
Also consider this:
At least here in USA average police response call is several minutes. They would just make a chalk line around the body and file report. This is in Washington DC. Immagine rural areas:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/may/10/20040510-122711-8996r/
Keep in mind that self defense is your responsibility.
Prager Hans
by Micky D on 19 April 2010 - 15:04
In that video series, a young man has a "French mastiff". He repeatedly states his dog acts "dodgy" and admits it is unpredictable, particularly since it got into a fight with another dog. Oh, and he is breeding the dog.
If anyone on this forum wants to say the individuals referenced above are ANYTHING but clueless as to dog behavior, at the time that video was shot have at it.
by bazza on 19 April 2010 - 15:04
Prager, don't know if yout question " Why do they have to be clueless" was to me or not but if it was then I was using the words of the previous poster.
Thugs will always have guns....THUGS being the operative word.
In answer to your question hypothetical of course. I honestly 100% would not need any gun in that situation and anyone who knows me knows why. I know gun carrying is the norm for USA and some other places, but not here in the UK, I have lived my long, happy, crime free life that way and will continue to do so. Do people here carry guns as weapons, sure, illegally, but it will never become legal for all to carry a gun, thankfully. That's our way of life as it is your way of life to carry them, each to their own.

by yoshy on 19 April 2010 - 16:04
See what many people fail to realize if dog, guns, cars etc... kill people because of the ignorance of the person using it.
I for one grew up with firearms. Mainly for the purpose of hunting and competition shooting. I also went into the military at 17 years of age and was further trained to use a wide variety of weapons and took deployments to afgan.
It is complete ignorance to take away firearms simply because of ignorance of a few. Those same ignorant people arent breaking into homes were they know the owner possesses and knows how to use a firearm. Statistically speaking the cities in which firearms are banned have a much higher violent crime rate. When you take the ability to defend yourself away you are fair game to be preyed upon by scum.
This is no different than my right to own a protection trained dog for both competition and personal protection. If I am unable to defend myself adequately you darn right i expect my dog to preform his duty.People forget dogs have been used to complete real work for many years! No different than I expect my firearm to do its duty when called upon. I look at it as the same principle as carrying a condom. I may not need it but i would rather have it should the occasion arise and you never pull it out unless you plan to use it!
Both should be used with extreme caution and the owner must carry such respect for his weapon whatever it may be. More people are killed every year by cars than gusn and dogs because of neglegence but you dont see them banned.
The issue here is simply ignorance/education- neglegence- responsibility- poor parenting for this Gen-Y etc.... When I was growing up if a dog bit you the 1st question that was asked was what did you do to the dog. Now its a vicious dog lets sue and put the dog down. Its because of ignorance of the population not the dog or the breed.
Pits happen to be great family dog if raised correctly. chihuahua's and other toy/designer breeds are the worst. Because people coddle them into developing sever issues and there are more dog bites a year from them than all bully breed put together. So why dont we ban small dogs because of people ignoranc? Just because a bully breed dog has the capability to harm more severe does that mean it should be killed? I have a rescue dog in my home that came with a bite history. He is now my most trusted and best dog. So tell me should he have been put down? he now lives with cats, dog, and fequently plays with children. So who has the right to put down a dog. Some idiot on a board with no true knowledge of dog phsycology to speak of?
Maybe if people spent more time actually working with dogs than posting on some board then they would wake up and realize the breed is not the problem. Its the people whom procure the dog. How many times have insuffient people bought GSD puppies and they were returned or neglected, or retained a bite history because of there ignorance. No different with any other breed on the plannet. Even golden retrievers bite people because of there ignorance. So i guess we should just get rid of all dogs. Thats how much sense some of the idiots posting on this thread make!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top