
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Myracle on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
They look just barely more stupid than they made Oli look when they humiliated on his own forum to further their own motives.
Really, its absurd to keep dancing around the fact that they were behind the lies told to Oli.
No one else has been screaming for weeks that SP was "doing things" with the site.
No one else seems to have an issue accepting Oli's public retraction.
No one else seems obsessed with insinuating that there's still "more to this story".
Who else is STILL alleging hacking that didn't occur, related to a pedigree, and making unreasonable, baseless demands of Oli.
Sadly, I doubt we'll ever see the truth because I think Oli has far too much class to expose them on the open forum.

by Myracle on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
Those are called ad hominem arguments, and are one of the most common logical fallacies.
AKA- attack the person because you cannot dispute their argument.

by RatPackKing on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
Remember me then Don,
RPK
by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
I do have to disagree that Oli has been "humiliated" by any troll, petit-troll or affiliated mental case. We all jump to conclusions sometimes without taking the time to verify facts. That just makes us human.

by DDR-DSH on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
I am just wondering how you would come to the conclusion that SP was transgressing in the first place, and noiw you say he was not???? Whatever it is, it is.. But, I have long believed that SOMEONE was hacking the forum, and I sitll believe that, because I have seen too many evidences of it. So have many other people. If not SP, then who or what is doing it? Personally, he would be my prime suspect, because he is always stirring the pot and making trouble.
Let me just say this, for the record.. I only want to be left alone by these people. I feel that I have every right to make a comment (just as anyone else, here) without being accused of being an animal abuser, and trying to sell puppies on this site. If I wanted to sell puppies on this site, I should also have THAT privilege, but for a fact I have never tried to sell puppies on this site. I have never done so. I had ONE young adult female that I listed here, and that was awhile ago. That seems to be when all the troubles started. I believe that I know who the person is, and if he thinks that I am competing with him for sales, he is delusional. If I had puppies to sell, I would advertise them on my own domain / site, and I would take the time and trouble to improve that site. I do not sell puppies to the public, anymore, because it is a pain in the ass, and I don't want it. I have only had two litters in twelve years time, and I have not sold any of them. I do not keep them, either. I give them to my friends and if they want to sel them and keep the money, that is fine. I don't want it. I am only interested in the dogs. If I happen to have an adult that I want to place or sell, then naturally I have to make some effort. But the one experience here was bad. I got no serious inquiries, only harrassment and nuisance contacts from scammers regarding cashier's checks and payment of shippers.
I just want these people to stop harrassing me. That's all. I don't need to have a bunch of crap posted about me from ten years ago, every time I make a post or answer a question or give an opinion. I feel that this is very little to ask.. I have now only three choices. I can ignore it and let it go on, or I can stop coming here altogether, or I can try to fight back. It would be easier just to avoid all this, but I hate bullies and I don't believe in feeding their egos and letting them win. So, I stay in the game and fight back when I am attacked. It's really that simple.

by Myracle on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
While I don't think Oli has been humiliated in the eyes of those of us who possess enough sense to deduce what actually occurred, to the casual observer, Oli may in fact look foolish.
Certainly, nona and Maggie continue to allege that Oli is incapable of, or unwilling to, determine the truth of the matter.
The implication being that Oli is somehow inept or unintelligent.

by MaggieMae on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
Then just go away
We Don't Like Animal Abusers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by VomMarischal on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
" None of you know a damn thing. No, this isn't over by a long shot. DD -- You are either Sue/Mystere or Hodie -- Your little "game" is going to backfire on you -- and as S.P. says, "You Can Take That To The Bank" !!"
OH! OH! SIDES ARE SPLITTING! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 03:09
I don't. For one thing, as opposed to you, I've acted with restraint and not polluted this site with my political opinions. Accordingly, you don't have a clue what they are.
Secondly, I'm guessing this place is no longer going to be a sanctuary for OT political and religious nonsense by then. So you'll have to go elsewhere to feed your ego.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top