GSDCA-WDA 2012 Financials - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 25 February 2014 - 16:02

If the subject is integrity shall we bring up the lies and cheating of the USCA at the WUSV qualifier 2013 or the 5 years of lies concerning the WUSV's recognition of the WDA as a member and scorebooks??  The integrity of the USCA's leadership is a matter of public disgrace.  The money spent by the WDA is a WDA matter as the membership elects our officers with an actual democratic system called one man and one vote.  We just had an election and Dan Yee won.  The conduct of the officers of the USCA and USCA membership ( they keep voting to do craptastic things ) toward the other GSD clubs ( USCA .. the GSDCA is your father according to Fasano ) and their membership has been lower than the lowest layer of whale feces in the deepest part of the deep blue sea.  I would suspect that the lies and cheating of the USCA leadership has not been entirely directed at "the enemy" which I believe the USCA defines as anyone not in the USCA.  The question is how many reported and published members does the USCA have??  I would suggest that if the USCA membership numbers are false then the financials by default must also be false.  I am aware that the USCA has lifetime members and I am also aware that the voter registration rolls in Chicago include people who reside under headstones in graveyards.  How many members??  the GSDCA-WDA reports their membership so why does the USCA not also do so precisely??  Between the years 2000 and 2005 the numbers reported in USCA board meetings verbally were over 5000 members so how many does the USCA have now??  Was the USCA leadership lieing then or now or both??  Personally I don't care if the USCA has one member or 1 million but since the USCA leadership has chosen to cheat, lie and slander the GSDCA and GSDCA-WDA membership why not have a "tell it all brothers" from those same leaders who think they can cast stones and not get a few tossed back in their windows even if those windows are blacked out with bars so that no one can see inside.  Sometimes difficult to tell if the USCA's bars keep the robbers out or the inmates in though.

Keith Grossman

by Keith Grossman on 25 February 2014 - 16:02

Please note the subject of this thread: "GSDCA-WDA 2012 Financials."

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 25 February 2014 - 16:02

gsdstudent wrote above

 "The GermanShepherd Dog brand should be represented with the utmost integrity. The National clubs are run by elected officials but basicly are volunteer. Each member expects the officers to uphold the interests of the breed. The officers have a fiduciary responcibility to conduct the business [s] of the organization in its own best interest."  

I believe lies and cheating are a reflection of integrity??


 

OGBS

by OGBS on 25 February 2014 - 16:02

I just looked at all the Hundegrams on the WDA web site. No numbers mentioned as far as total membership of the club.
If the WDA is so transparent about their membership numbers what are they???
You seem to profess to know everything Boo Boo, so what are the numbers???
The last I heard the WDA has fallen below 550 members. More, some of them are quite prominent in the organization, will be leaving soon.
The WDA has Dan Yee, and his buddy John Henkel, and Alethea to thank for the destruction of the WDA.

Here are some facts:
2011 WDA NASS = 364 dogs (taken from Oct.31, 2011 Hundegram)
2013 WDA NASS = 139 dogs (taken from 2013 NASS web site)
I've been to local conformation shows that had almost as many dogs entered as the 2013 NASS.

Victory,
You mentioned that Henkel said to you, "you don't know what it takes to run a world event!"
You will have to take his word on this one. He should know because he doesn't know how to run one either.
He does know how to ruin a once viable organization, though.

by beetree on 25 February 2014 - 16:02

where can I find the same for the USCA??  Is it a published number??  


http://multimedia.journalism.berkeley.edu/tutorials/nonprofits-and-charities/irs-form-990s-online/


 


bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 25 February 2014 - 17:02

A link to Dan Yee's letter to WDA members pre-election with numbers .. as with any politician I suspect the truth has been stretched and sins of ommission .. so what did the USCA candidates promise ??  A sweep of the WUSV qualifier and victory at the 2013 WUSV .. didn't happen did it??  I don't need any help finding 1099 forms but I do need help finding what the USCA leadership has reported in writing to the USCA membership concerning membership numbers.  In 2003 I believe it was stated at a board meeting that membership was 5500 .. any idea what the board is reporting now??

http://gallery.mailchimp.com/7229c52c6f10bafe7b8dfc003/files/Dan_Yee_Message.001.pdf

by Unknown on 25 February 2014 - 17:02

Bubba Booboo you are a very sad human being. You lie constantly, I'm not sure even you can be dumb enough to believe the things you say..
Please show us where one thing you say in your statement is correct. Bottom line is, you can't.
No one promised a USCA sweep in the qualifier and no one promised a victory at the WUSV. NO ONE


You can keep deflecting all you want, USCA has nothing to do with this.

Try dealing with your own mess and stop trying to deflect this into a USCA thing. We have nothing to do with this mess, it is ALL YOURS!!!!

by cmandela on 25 February 2014 - 17:02

In that same message from Dan Yee he lists as an accomplishment the fact that the WDA can now submit digital x-rays to the SV.  That was over 5 months ago and the WDA website still says that digital x-rays are NOT ACCEPTED.  So what's the story can digital x-rays be submitted or not?  One would think that if the announcement was made by the President on 9/12/2013, that here come 2/25/2014 there would have been some notification sent out to the members or some instructions on how to submit the digital x-rays.  Just saying that you can't believe all that you read....

by Gustav on 25 February 2014 - 17:02

Whenever you point to another to answer a question about original topic, you are guilty!

bubbabooboo

by bubbabooboo on 25 February 2014 - 17:02

Yes and UNKNOWN .. who is very well known as one of those who was involved and well in the know about the qualifier debacle and lots of other USCA cheating and lies involving scorebooks and the GSDCA-WDA .. the WUSV qualifier sweep didn't happen though Caputo tried and did skew the results enough to once again cheat Krista Wade out of her spot.  Alas then the master plan went further off course and the fair haired children and usual suspects representing the USCA on Team USA WUSV 2013 had some unfortunate results at the 2013 WUSV World Championships or perhaps the same results they always had but with more honest and less USCA friendly judges.  I'll be glad to stop talking about the USCA cheating and lies when the USCA stops cheating and lieing.  WUSV qualifier 2014 should be interesting as the WUSV and the entire little GSD world (of the WUSV) will be watching how the event is conducted.  The smear on the AWDF championships by denying Ivan Balabanov and Ebor their championship just serves as proof that it was not unfortunate luck that changed the results but a concious effort by the USCA to deal from the bottom of the deck.  Apparently the WUSV agrees and the USCA won't handle the cards in 2014 at the qualifier for the 2014 WUSV World Championships.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top