The Evolution Of The Topline In The GSD - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Preston on 21 February 2008 - 23:02

Marci, if a GSD doesn't walk naturally into an attractive show stance, it is not constructed optimally.  Take V1 Shotaan Alfons above.  This appears to be a natural pose.  This dog is built true to the standard. The main points of my posts in this subject line is:  that a long back can stabilize a GSD with very faulty movement, making it appear a much better mover than it is (esp. if it has long lower rear thigh and is sickle hocked), but at a great cost;  and that a highly roachy (arched upward) back transmits power curvilinearly downward to the front, causing rump rollup and very faulty movement; and any back issue including a weak back reduces the efficiency and enduarnce of the GSD and it's working ability.  What we want to see in the GSD is a short, strong back and styraight linear transmission of rear drive from the croup at a slight upward angle, permitting maximum efficiency of movement forward while allowing enough lift for full suspension.


Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 22 February 2008 - 01:02

I'm glad you like her, Preston. BTW, you do realize she's half American showlines? Yes, there's a few good ones out there still  I'm hoping to see more American breeders making use of German blood in the future, to improve soundness and temperment.  Okay, maybe I'm dreaming, but there are some hopeful signs: the dog that took best of opposite sex at Westminister this year is a grandson of Jim v. Fiemereck!

When comparing my bitch to Stephanitz's dogs, she's sure got the mischief part down pat!    I am hoping once spring comes, and we're able to get out more, she'll work off her energy, and  won't get into quite so much trouble, but in the meanwhile, she has to go in her crate every time I leave the house. The dogsitter left her out while I was away for a few days recently, and boy, did I come home to a mess!  I had to put her outside for a bit until I calmed down.  Lucky for her she's so sweet natured: she plunks herself in my lap, and begs to be petted, gives me kisses in return, and all is forgiven!


by marci on 22 February 2008 - 05:02

Preston... the back consists of the vertebrae on top of the rib-cage past the withers then upto the vertebrae of the loins (pelvis not included...thats the croup right.???) I noticed that the curvation of the backbones in the MIDDLE between the rib-cage and the loin being the highest peak... ribs^loin.... and the loin vertebra slopes downward toward the pelvis making the croup's leverage longer than the withers (considering the back as the fulcrum...) I noticed the rib-cage-topline sloping FORWARD ( then connects to the withers) and the Loin area sloping towards the rear...  So when you have the rear Paws directly below the pelvis... the HUMP ( joint between the rib-cage and Loin area) shows and  the UNLEVEL Short Back...  The Back is level only when the rear legs are towards the rear and not directly below the pelvice...  This is common also in Belgian Mals... I am currently looking for a good one that I could apply the Conformation and engineering of the GSD...  But anyways...  You still must look for a level back when the dog is running OFF-leash... 


by Speaknow on 22 February 2008 - 09:02

You ask curly ones, Aand: “So a dog with a steep croup that is outside the standard but suits it's structure should move better than a dog who's croup is correct to the standard but not to it's structure. In this case who should/would be judged the better dog?” The ideal croup is of good length, blends smoothly into backline, and for the GSD ideally lies at vaunted 22 odd degrees. Trouble is, this angle presupposes that backline, if not the rest, is of similar ideal shape, whatever that is: the Standard doesn’t give much in the way of precise dimensions, more in terms of overall proportions and ratios (doesn’t devote much space to steeply sloping toplines either!) Then, what’s ‘steep’? – anything approaching 30 degrees certainly is, whereas our ‘perfect’ 22 degrees would fit rather oddly to the shorter curvy back. I think you’d have to go by which dog as a whole is the most harmoniously proportioned, whilst preferring the croup which most smoothly continues/extends the backline. I agree with Preston’s ‘vectors’ but think it far better to picture a dog’s structure as a relatively straightforward mechanical contraption, a system of levers (major bones) and pulling ropes (muscles/ligaments). The most efficient way to pull at a lever is at 90 degrees and this simple fact underlies much of the rationale relating to angulation/function etc. Instead of continuing and as my understanding generally varies from his, best left at that.

by marci on 22 February 2008 - 09:02

This line came from Blitzen... while I was reading from some of the previous threads...

The sighthounds do want a slight arch beginning in the loin area never just behind the withers as seen in some GSD's.

Is this the same BREAK in the topline I'm seing in modern GSD's ( rib-cage^loin area ).  ???

And then...when the paws are directly below the pelvis this "break" is accentuated.. In movement or when the rear legs are stacked... the shortback become level to the ground...

 


AandA

by AandA on 22 February 2008 - 10:02

Speaknow, unfortunately curly questions often get curly answers... but in this case the reply does strike as being reasonable.

AandA


by marci on 07 May 2008 - 20:05

Glad to be back... Checking on the recent posts in the ***messageboard***  I stumbled upon this dog that  visualized what I am asking from Blitzen about the UNLEVEL TOPLINE...

 

The dogs name is Hill v. Pannonia Wolf...  ANY IDEAS about this MODERN GERMAN Topline.???  What lines contribute to it.??? I know for sure the Rickor Badboll line has this type of back line...

I'm just happy to be back and browse again very important knowledge gained from GSD enthusiasts...

MARCI


Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 07 May 2008 - 20:05

Ah, yes, that dog is in my Uglydog picture file already.... I'd like to hear others comment on his structure. If you check his pedigree, there are some very nice dogs there, including Kevin v. Murtal. His sire has a rather ugly looking topline, too, but most of the other dogs in his pedigree have nearly level backs.

The picture on file with his pedigree doesn't make him look quite as bad as that photo does.


pagan

by pagan on 07 May 2008 - 21:05

I do not like that dog at all he is roach backed and over angulated to steep on the croup


Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 07 May 2008 - 21:05

Actually, the upper arm is short and steeply angulated, while the back is overangulated. I hate to think what the poor beast must look like when he's moving!  His front end looks far too heavy for his back end to drive forward.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top