This is a placeholder text
Group text
by brynjulf on 09 January 2011 - 20:01
.
by buckeyefan gsd on 09 January 2011 - 21:01
imo spaying and neutering at 9 weeks is far more cruel than
simply culling
i often wanted to ask this on here
if you really want an offspring of a dog you own
would it be cruel to breed that animal and select
one pup to keep and eliminate the rest?
other than personaly not being able to kill an entire litter
is this really that unethical?
some may not want to worry about the lives of any pups
they didnt keep.
fire away
by Uber Land on 10 January 2011 - 00:01
by beetree on 10 January 2011 - 01:01
one pup to keep and eliminate the rest?"
Buckeye, in my view, yes, it is a callous waste of life. Ethically wrong and totally selfish. Doable, apparently. Right? Hell NO.
by eichenluft on 10 January 2011 - 04:01
by Jenni78 on 10 January 2011 - 17:01
I would think anyone even daring to breed any animal would be well-versed in basic healthcare procedures and the associated risks/benefits, so I don't want to go posting articles and insult you.
I have to agree w/Buckeye on the early spaying and neutering. I think is way up there in terms of cruelty. Even most humane societies, as behind as they are, have abandoned the practice due to the dangers. Do vets not have to take a hippocratic oath? Do no harm? Or did they forget that part?!
If it turns out you're serious, Brynjulf, I will gladly post articles.
To answer your question, Buckeye, I don't think it is ever right to create animals so nonchalantly that you think it's ok to kill the ones you don't want. They did not occur naturally; YOU created them. Barring something wrong with them, you don't have the right, IMO, to now kill them. I think if everyone thought long and hard about what they were breeding and why, we wouldn't have so many reasons to cull.
by buckeyefan gsd on 10 January 2011 - 21:01
i dont breed or ever plan to,i do however see nothing wrong
with breeding for the soul purpose of keeping your pick
of the offspring.
if you humanely destroy the others.
i definately dont think the vet humanley does it
i think some times people often are influenced by religion
as to thinking it is moraly wrong or unethical.
i would say it is much more unethicaln to breed hundreds of dfogs
per year for money than to breed a favorite pet and only keep one.
like i said some may not want to worry about a pup they bred and sold
or gave away.it is better culled than abused.
by beetree on 10 January 2011 - 21:01
by buckeyefan gsd on 10 January 2011 - 21:01
by malndobe on 10 January 2011 - 21:01
As long as it's done humanely, I doubt it's illegal in any state. I don't know of a single state that doesn't have animal shelters who put down healthy animals on a regular basis. Considering many are government run, if it was illegal for them to be euthanizing animals, they wouldn't be doing it.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top