Problem at last weeks trial in Mich.?????? - Page 8

Other discussions will only maybe help those who get angry quickly, count to three before , showing it outwardly at a public trial or a club meeting when being in competition for points or position to go on to the top.

All of us are human..But when one man who keeps doing these bad behaviours gets by with mega of them with no punishment

Our choice is how we react and how we handle todays pressure . .

 And my point was to know the facts before you choose to openly defend or charge someone with an offense.  Most cases it's just better to sit on the fence and let the parties involved deal with it.  Unfortunately, sometimes people assume 'oh it's just one occurrence', without actually knowing it isn't.  If you are a personal friend of Tim and Chris let them respond to the facts I have presented above.  

For those of you who haven't ever participated in a schutzhund event, or a sporting event, to be a great winner, you have to be a gracious loser.  I always thought this was about the dogs, not the inflated ego's behind them......Dogs don't choose to screw us on trial day, it's usually the idiot standing next to them that does it for them.  Same in training, when a dog does something out of the norm, I always ask myself "what did I do different, or may have done different'.  99% of the time, if you are observant you'll find it was you........

What else is new?

<<And my point was to know the facts before you choose to openly defend or charge someone with an offense.  Most cases it's just better to sit on the fence and let the parties involved deal with it.  Unfortunately, sometimes people assume 'oh it's just one occurrence', without actually knowing it isn't.  If you are a personal friend of Tim and Chris let them respond to the facts I have presented above. >>

Why does anyone need to defend themselves to you on a message board?  The only person they/he needs to explain anything to, will be the UScA if it comes to that.. 

Sounds like you have a personal vendetta against them?

 "Why does anyone need to defend themselves to you on a message board?  The only person they/he needs to explain anything to, will be the UScA if it comes to that.. "

Very good point.  They didn't need to, but they willingly chose to.  And you're right, if the UScA does find fault, hopefully people will realize it's not always people slamming people.  Sometimes it's information that just needs to get out. 

"Sounds like you have a personal vendetta against them?"

Again, you are very perceptive.  I have personal issues with anybody who disrespects others, especially those that can't protect themselves.

At this point we can agree that we are opposite ends of the spectrum on this topic.  You're opinion is based on personal experiences that have been very positive.  Mine are based on the 'facts' above, and those facts are NOT debatable.