
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Prager on 22 February 2010 - 23:02
Hans

by gsdsch3v on 23 February 2010 - 00:02
The dog was not doing detection. He was just standing there with his handler..Thus the muzzle at that time would be appropriate.
Please read the article before you make comments.
I am done here.
Prager Hans
I did read the article which stated that they were there to do detection training. Just because the dog was not actively sniffing in the opinion of the author does not mean that they were not training. Why else would they have been in the scenario. Unless you get a copy of the official review you will never know what went on or what the set up was. They certainly aren't going to tell the press much with a good chance for litigation on the table.

by Prager on 23 February 2010 - 00:02
Prager Hans

by gsdsch3v on 23 February 2010 - 02:02
Sorry, on the idea of muzzling the psd's I agree with slam. Still don't see a need for it as a blanket deal here. But I also don't see the point of giving up anymore personal freedom because some freak tries to explode his underwear.

by Prager on 23 February 2010 - 02:02

Prager Hans

by Mindhunt on 23 February 2010 - 02:02
My friend is Native American and has threatened to bring back scalping (that was taught to Native Americans) if she ever caught a handler using violence, if they choose to shave their head, well she will scalp what isn't shaved.

by 4pack on 23 February 2010 - 05:02
by Jon luc on 23 February 2010 - 18:02
thats ridiculous everyone know it's flat.
I think when every body says whats on there mind you have a better chance
at getting to the true. But that may be ridiculous.

by DDR-DSH on 24 February 2010 - 04:02
To tell you the truth, even those open wire muzzles are possible to get a finger into, or a tooth out of. I've seen a dog who knew how to get a tooth out of such a muzzle and hook onto some skin to tear. But, it's better than nothing at all. Muzzles that are more closed are absolutely unsafe for the dog, and can cause the dog to overheat and die.
I don't necessarily think that an aggressive dog is a bad dog. Absolutely, there is a purpose for these dogs in the world, and a need. But I think that this was not the place to put a (probably) high-drive dual purpose dog, still in training. Most of the time, when dogs get into trouble, it's human error and mismanagement.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top