
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Mackenzie on 17 February 2017 - 20:02
Mackenzie
by Bavarian Wagon on 17 February 2017 - 20:02
People for some reason expect the tiny minority to keep the working ability of the GSD alive and well without needing to go anywhere else...and it's impossible to do so. Even those people that have done it right and imposed SV standards onto themselves eventually stop and just breed without standards as they can get the same amount for the dogs while investing way less into them. I've seen countless breeders stop testing dogs and just expecting the pedigree to make working dogs...yet somehow most working dogs in this country are still imported from countries that require breeding standards.

by Lunastar on 17 February 2017 - 21:02
So, only albino whites and merles colors are known for color linked health problems. Many albinos either die in the womb or even after birth from all the health issues they have. Others live very short lives from all the health issues they have. And as far as I know albino whites and merles have not been seen in GSDs in many years, other dog breeds from Great Danes to Australian Shepherds however suffer from breeding albinos and merles. It should be illegal to breed two dogs with those colors together as it is a guarantee the puppies will suffer. There have been a few dogs said to be merle GSDs in recent history, but no DNA testing was done to confirm they were in fact full GSDs.
Blue, Isabella/lilac, and chocolate/liver in GSDs are also said to have health issues linked to the colors, yet health tests on such dogs say otherwise. It's funny how people are claiming a color is tied to bad health, yet there are plenty of scientists that have proven those colors do not carry any problems. The show breeders just dislike the colors and are being color racists. I always imagine them some day putting up signs at GSD dog shows saying "Red or tans with black saddles and masks only!" Like how there use to be "Whites Only, No Colored!" signs all over. Seems like all the other colors, even the original sables, solid blacks, and bi-colors that helped make the breed, are being hated by show GSD breeders and show people in general. So Max would cry alright. He'd cry about how the current show GSDs look nothing like the breed he founded. His breed was straight backed, stock/smooth coated, had a thin build, long legs, wolf like heads, came in a wide variety of colors/patterns as well. Now we have sloped backs, the original coat types plus a silky long haired (Which he would really hate as it tangles bad.), big boned builds, shorter legs, mastiff like heads, and only a few colors allowed on breed standard. Max would die all over again if he saw how a show GSD's rear can touch the ground... while the dog was standing up! I cry seeing that. Wish I could forget ever seeing that even. Eye bleach.
by beetree on 17 February 2017 - 23:02

by max930 on 18 February 2017 - 02:02
In both GSD's and Rottweiler's. If I see one foo foo show name in the pedigree or even offspring they produced. I won't get a dog from them period!
by Mackenzie on 18 February 2017 - 05:02
Mackenzie

by Hundmutter on 18 February 2017 - 06:02
@ Mackenzie -

by Sunsilver on 18 February 2017 - 12:02
Many breeds can have ticking spots from Pointers to Border Collies. From what I've seen there is nothing wrong with the Panda mutation GSDs.
Lunastar, you obviously have NOT read this whole thread! The Panda gene is LETHAL in its homozygous form. If you cross Panda with Panda, statistically 50% of the offspring will fail to develop and die in the womb.
I don't know about you, but to me that makes it ethically WRONG to breed these dogs.
You say some Pandas have been certified as police dogs. Can you show us proof, please? Are they narc/bomb dogs or street patrol dogs?

by Reliya on 18 February 2017 - 14:02
(I'm just arguing to argue because debating is fun. Feel free to ignore me.)
by beetree on 18 February 2017 - 14:02
I would be happy to expound on my POV, right after Hundmutter explains the difference between patriotism and Anglophile.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top