The Ultimate Proof of Creation - Dr. Jason Lisle - Page 8

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

rtdmmcintyre

by rtdmmcintyre on 05 October 2013 - 23:10

This is what I'm talking about.  when you post things as fact with out doing research, and being sure of your facts you bring disgrace.  You are trying to prove something true with an untruth.  Albert Einstein never made this statement.  When someone comes across as a wacko then that is the type who gets all the attention, then everyone thinks anyone who believes must be a wacko.  The person who tries to be reasonable never stands in the front row yelling look at me, so they often go unnoticed by the majority, because they try to show honor to the subject matter. 

by vk4gsd on 06 October 2013 - 00:10

shtal you are such a deceitful man - evil.

 


Did Albert Einstein write a book titled God vs Science in 1921?



 
In: Albert Einstein [Edit categories]
 




Answer:
There is no historical proof that accompanies this rumor. God vs. Science is a chain e-mail created by someone who didn't know Einstein, but insisted that he wrote it (in hopes of gathering credibility for his points). The chain e-mail itself isn't bad, but it's obvious where the bias exists, and it's even more obvious that Einstein not only wasn't the student mentioned, but also had nothing to do with with a book called "God vs. Science" written in 1921


also;
http://www.snopes.com/religion/einstein.asp


and some actual FACTS on what Einstein SAID

Einstein was raised by secular Jewish parents. In his Autobiographical Notes, Einstein wrote that he had gradually lost his faith early in childhood:

. . . I came—though the child of entirely irreligious (Jewish) parents—to a deep religiousness, which, however, reached an abrupt end at the age of twelve. Through the reading of popular scientific books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of the Bible could not be true. The consequence was a positively fanatic orgy of freethinking coupled with the impression that youth is intentionally being deceived by the state through lies; it was a crushing impression. Mistrust of every kind of authority grew out of this experience, a skeptical attitude toward the convictions that were alive in any specific social environment—an attitude that has never again left me, even though, later on, it has been tempered by a better insight into the causal connections. It is quite clear to me that the religious paradise of youth, which was thus lost, was a first attempt to free myself from the chains of the 'merely personal,' from an existence dominated by wishes, hopes, and primitive feelings. Out yonder there was this huge world, which exists independently of us human beings and which stands before us like a great, eternal riddle, at least partially accessible to our inspection and thinking. The contemplation of this world beckoned as a liberation, and I soon noticed that many a man whom I had learned to esteem and to admire had found inner freedom and security in its pursuit. The mental grasp of this extra-personal world within the frame of our capabilities presented itself to my mind, half consciously, half unconsciously, as a supreme goal. Similarly motivated men of the present and of the past, as well as the insights they had achieved, were the friends who could not be lost. The road to this paradise was not as comfortable and alluring as the road to the religious paradise; but it has shown itself reliable, and I have never regretted having chosen it.[2]


Shtal

by Shtal on 06 October 2013 - 00:10

vk4 wrote: shtal you are such a deceitful man - evil.


Sleepy

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 06 October 2013 - 00:10

Honor.......that's funny.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 06 October 2013 - 00:10

Personally,
I think your both idiots....lol

Shtal

by Shtal on 06 October 2013 - 01:10


by vk4gsd on 06 October 2013 - 01:10

 

how does any of that vid support the bible, an appeal to "the smart guy" so two dumb guys at the end can place an ad in for the bible, so lol.



Einstein himself stated quite clearly that he did not believe in a personal God:

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly."3

No personal God

So, the quick answer to the question is that Einstein did not believe in a personal God. However, it is interesting how he arrived at that conclusion. In developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Of course, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God:

"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."4


Shtal

by Shtal on 06 October 2013 - 03:10

vk4,

I was looking at your link that it talks about the beginning, can you clarify for me please, I got confuse because the Big Bang theory does not explain origin of time, space and matter; what exploded? Where did it come from? Where did the energy come from? And second thing how do they know the Big Bang actually happened? - the Big Bang idea began with a Belgian astronomer, Georges Edward Lemaitre, the idea was that this mass to be “no more than a few lights-years in diameter at the very least that would be two light-years or about twelve trillions miles across - when exploded. Later by year 1965 that figure was reduced to 275 millions mile across. And by 1972 it was reduced to 71 millions miles, and by 1974 it dropped to only 54 thousand miles. Finally by 1983 it came to “a trillionth the diameter of a proton,” but now in 21st century, science teach "nothing at all" (singularity), can you clarify for me how do they know that they are sure this time it's only this "small dot" brought order universe what we see today.


Thanks in advanced.
Shtal.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 06 October 2013 - 03:10

Another unproven theory that is incorrect and incomplete.
Maybe you should stick to Einstein........

If you ever come up with something besides theories, he said she said, and myth, let me know.
 

Shtal

by Shtal on 06 October 2013 - 05:10

In this video Dr. Jason Lisle talks about the universe.

 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top