
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by BabyEagle4U on 17 July 2012 - 13:07
by joanro on 17 July 2012 - 13:07

by GSDNewbie on 17 July 2012 - 13:07
You may not know that our constitution does not require that any candidate for President be of a specific faith. In the US we are allowed to worship where, when and who we choose. This country was founded on that concept. What was yours founded on?
Yet many times Romney being Mormon has been belittled and attacked on these threads by same poster.
Examples from the posts:
We can keep this up all year. There are just as many inaccurate and exagerated links out there trashing Romney as there are Obama. Read this about Romney? He a high priest in the mormon church and says satan and Jesus are brother. Do you believe it? Why? Wanna see more?
The religious zealots in this country are such hypocrits and liars......and we are allowing them to infleunce our elections?
If it was on the net, it has to be true, doesn't it, BE? Did you know that Mitt was born in Afghanistan and his father was a German Shepherd? He's actually not eligible to run for President. Also he's a moron, oops mormon, high priest and you know how those mormons are with all those wives. Geez....talk about hidden agendas.
Again respect wanted when talking about one side when none is offered for the other candidate.
just found on another thread:
I wish the Paul supporters good luck. It would be even a more interesting election with all the right wing zealots not quite knowing who to support - the Muslim atheist or the old guy who wants to legalize pot. I imagine many have already compromised their ethics when they decided to support a Mormon high priest. Maybe they will write in Norquist. For sure they will need to scramble to rewrite their script if Romney doesn't prevail.
by Blitzen on 17 July 2012 - 14:07
Never mind, my bad.

by GSDNewbie on 17 July 2012 - 14:07
by Blitzen on 17 July 2012 - 14:07
Do you understand the concept of using rhetoric to make a point? Didn't you get that what I said about Romney was said in jest?

by GSDguy08 on 17 July 2012 - 14:07
Blitzen, no where in this has Shtal judged, though you accused him of doing so. I went through the whole thread and found nothing that was him judging. I find it very interesting how you claim the bible is crap, and religion is a joke, but yet you come back to fight Shtal with the very scriptures itself. Why is that? If it is of no value, you shouldn't have to come back at Shtal with it. You have however claimed no one is to make a judgement on someone.....And you used the scripture in Matthew, but did you look at the last sentence in that? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye. Note the last part of that "and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye".......
And even in the Romans passage it is referring to those who practice certain sins, but yet judge others who do the same things.......as in being hypocritical. The truth is, if we go by what the scriptures say we are called to judge others...so long as we are not being hypocrites.....The scriptures even go to say that the Saints will judge the world....and even the angels. The truth is though, any time a Christian says something about the scriptures....if it goes against anything someone else does, they say the Christian is being judgmental, hateful, etc. It makes the person very uneasy......Which I find ironic, as Christians are told to tolorate (by non Christians) what others do and not say anything.....but yet it's okay for the non Christians to bash and belittle Christianity? Really? Even among Christians there are those who say "you're juding me" and they don't like it. Question to you Blitzen....Being a Christian deals with living as the New Testament commands them to live. If a person who is a Christian and claims to believe the bible, but doesn't follow what much of what it tells them to do......goes to church and hears the preacher condemning certain things that they actually do that they should not be doing according to the scriptures......Would that be judgmental? (2 Timothy 4:1-5) Christians "should" want to know where they are wrong according to the scriptures, and sometimes it takes another to point that out. I see nowhere, where Shtal judged in any way in this thread. And if Christians can't judge, how are they to see the difference between righteousness and wickedness?
! Corinthians 6:1-6 is partially speaking of discouraging lawsuits, but it does go to mention who the Christians will judge...
Does any one of you, when he has a case against his neighbor, dare to go to law before the unrighteous and not before the saints? 2 Or do you not know that the saints will judge the world? If the world is judged by you, are you not competent to constitute the smallest law courts? 3 Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more matters of this life? 4 So if you have law courts dealing with matters of this life, do you appoint them as judges who are of no account in the church? 5 I say this to your shame. Is it so, that there is not among you one wise man who will be able to decide between his brethren, 6 but brother goes to law with brother, and that before unbelievers?
1 Corinthians 2: 14-16 The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. 15 The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. 16 “For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.
by Blitzen on 17 July 2012 - 15:07
by desert dog on 17 July 2012 - 15:07
Eisenhower was the first president I remember. Those were pretty good days, interstate hiways started being built. He was loved by a lot of people both dems and republcans. But had his whore around for many years. Check it out yourself.
When Kennedy ran against Nixon, Most christian churches were at that time convinced the Catholic church was the anti-christ. Very liberal and non christian. kennedy was a great civil rights president and work, and the economy was good,and in my opinion he was a president that brought both sides together and bring hope to people,i don't remember having bomb drills in school after he was killed. He was also a party going, skirt chaser.
Then came LBJ., Who did more for civil rights than any president in history. I do remember segregated store lines, drinking fountains, blacks were treated like non-human beings even after fighting for our freedom and dying for this country. I remember at night on the news German Shepherd attack dogs being used on them just because they weren't the same color as us But president Johnson even after all his successes in bills he got passed left office as a drunk, low rating because of the war.
Then came Nixon, a Quaker. The lowest of low in my opinion. A crook, Liar, watergate, to much to list. But I believe his daughter is a really good person. So he couldn't have been all bad. The biggest thing I noticed was people began to not trust government much.
Gerald Ford, Good guy, just not much.
jimmy Carter, A babtist Chistian. A very honest person. Nothing much worked for him. A real friend to Isreal and worked hard for peace in the middle east while the economy here in America went to crap.
Ronald Reagan, professed christian, retired actor, ex gov. of Calif. Ex union president of the screen actors guild while he was benifiting from it. Decided on trickle down economics, money for rich and break the unions. Defeat Russia by out spending them, He did and it worked but darn near broke the country in the process. Made the comment on tv that a worker was not worth what they were being paid, and started a division between labor and management across the nation. Those have been the worst years for work in my lifetime. The economy for construction went to pot in a heartbeat.. But some people liked him . I still can't figure that out.
George Bush, Christian man. completely out of touch with working class. Again money at the top that did not trickle down. But a good person.
President Clinton. A confessed christian, ex gov. He had a way of communicating with average people. Brought the economy back. Crime rate went down. The economy was the best in my lifetime. The middle class began to make a comeback. Religious right hated him said he was no christian, The greatest president in my lifetime in my opinion. But a blow job done him in.
George W., A christian, oil man, surrounded by a lot of big business crooks. Anti labor, instrumental in getting us in 2 wars on credit. Again like Reagan darn near brought the nation to a financial disaster. If you doubt it , remember when McCain and Obama called off their campaigns to return to Washington to help the eminent collaps of the financial markets. All total failure of a administration, controlled by Cheney and Karl Rove.
President Obama, a professed christian, saved GM, Chrysler, killed Bin Laden, passed health care bill cut all to pieces trying to get bipartisan support from a do nothing republican congress. Economy is improving slow. Work for the middle class is coming back.
I will vote for Obama, there is no way I would vote for someone with a "Trickle Down" theology. It has never worked and never will. What will destroy this country is extremists that refuse to work together for the overall good of the nation. You can never have freedom or liberty if you don't respect others their rights to disagree with yours.
Hank

by GSDguy08 on 17 July 2012 - 15:07
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top