Benghazi Cover Up - Page 7

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 03 November 2012 - 02:11

I am sure it does but I will take the current over flopper and medicare killer any day of the week. Did you vote for Bush but somehow you see Obama as worse, lmao. Well good luck on Tueday. Over and out, flip/flop.
Rowney = a bad case of GWBisms. More wars, less jobs, larger government, more to the super rich  and more spending, flip/flop.

It is all Obamas fault.
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/190324/conservative-fringe-obama-used-haarp-to-create-hurricane-sandy-for-election-win/

Ninja,
You appear to have short term memory loss. "What has Bush got to do with the Benghazi cover up?"
On the third post into this thread you are the first to bring up your hero.
"By the way your ILK was professing that 911 happened on “Bushs’ watch”, so it was in essence his fault if I remember correctly."
So, once you brought him up he became on topic. duh. LMFAO.

by Preston on 03 November 2012 - 05:11

Okay, here is another view on the Benghazi murder of Chris Stevens you won't likely hear about in the major mass media. The source for this is usually pretty good, but folks must draw their own conclusions.  Sometimes fact is stranger than fiction and quite unexpected.

Benghazi was not a consulate but a US CIA compound with two warehouses which had been filled with Libyan arms seized when Khadafi was deposed. These arms were in the process of being distributed to Al Quedae which have been supported and used by America as a private mercenary force along with some other muslim militant groups. Chris Stevens was a part of this initially but got cold feet when he found out how these weapons were actually being deployed and that there were ground to air missiles that were going to be dispensed. He had five hard core private contractor security ops around him which abandoned him when it was decided by those in the shadow govt who control black ops that he was a  "loose end" (these men left the scene, abandoned Stevens and survived).  What happened is considered damage control to those top shadow govt officials that run the black programs that ordered this.

There were two navy seals that were heros that refused to stand down and came to protect Stevens and one technical computer tech that died too. There was at least one armed drone circling and the seals outlined the target (those attacking) with lasers and the Pentagon refused to allow the drones to fire missiles at the attackers. Gun ships could have easily been deployed. It had been decided to let Stevens be killed because the bklack ops controllers concluded that Steven would not come around and was going to be a serious security risk to the operation (that he would go public with this new gunrunning and arms scandal and the transfer of missiles). So basically the folks in control of all US Black OPs made the decision to have Stevens murdered to shut him up. One General and One admiral immediately protested and started interfering. They were both immediately relieved of command on the spot by their no. 2 men (traitors imo for doing this and letting Stevens and the seal be murdered). 

This is unprecedented in the history of the US Military and may signal the ides of march or the crossing of the rubicon.  Obama and his staffed watched the affair live from the situation room, but Obama was told what was being done and had no authority in this matter. When top generals and admirals are relieved of commands on the spot illegally to protect war crimes, you can imagine the waves of shock now running through the DOD system. Obama and his staffed watched the affair live from the situation room, but Obama was told what was being done and had no authority in this matter. When top generals and admirals are relieved of command on the spot illegally to protect a murder and war crimes, you can imagine the waves of shock now running through the DOD system. Stay tuned because you can bet there is a lot going in behind the scenes right now inside the highest levels of the DOD and Intel.

http://israelinsider.net/profiles/blogs/top-us-general-and-admiral-reported-canned-over-benghazi-actions-

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/10/was-africom-general-replaced-for-his-efforts-to-save-benghazi-security-officials/

Ninja181

by Ninja181 on 03 November 2012 - 14:11

Where is the American Public's outrage over the "Benghazi Cover Up" from Obama?

Must be the fact that certain major television networks as corrupt as the Obama White house refuse to discuss the deliberate refusal to assist Americans in peril.

Make a contribution to your country, vote Obama out of office.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 03 November 2012 - 15:11

Idiots.

by Preston on 03 November 2012 - 18:11


by beetree on 03 November 2012 - 21:11

It certainly is inconvenient for Obama and his re-election strategy. I think they just want this one to slide into oblivion .... at least until after the election. Didn't Hillary already fall on the knife for him for this? http://www.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/clinton-benghazi/index.html 

And now it is the CIA falling on the knife for him?  I just can't see how anyone reading the myriad supply of links on this thread can have a doubt, that even I could have planned that fiasco better. What Smile

This, from Oman, even... 
http://www.timesofoman.com/innercat.aspx?detail=15010 
 Due to the clandestine nature of its work, the Central Intelligence Agency was initially spared from scrutiny, but now the spy service and its director, former US Army general David Petraeus, are on the defensive.  
The Wall Street Journal suggested Friday that the CIA's fixation with secrecy may have led to confusion over security at the compound and crossed signals with the State Department.
Due to the clandestine nature of its work, the Central Intelligence Agency was initially spared from scrutiny, but now the spy service and its director, former US Army general David Petraeus, are on the defensive.

The Wall Street Journal suggested Friday that the CIA's fixation with secrecy may have led to confusion over security at the compound and crossed signals with the State Department.

 


by Preston on 04 November 2012 - 00:11

Good articles Beetree.  Very informative. Too bad mainstream news won't cover this.



by Preston on 05 November 2012 - 04:11

ggturner, the articles you listed are disturbing but apper to be accurate and well documented. Sad that a reputable award winning investigative journalist is mistreated and not allowed to report the truth in the major media she reported for.  This suggests that our American major mass media are linked to powerful elites that control the USG. I guess the only way out of this mess is to utilize the alternative media on the Internet like Drudgereport.com, Infowars.com, whatreallyhappened.com, rense.com, Veteranstoday.com and many others.  The mainstream media have been losing listeners and viewers by the millions the last few years and the alternative media on the Internet have been gaining these folks.  It has been hypothesized that the only thing keeping the major mass media (six int'l news and media corporations) from going bankrupt are the drug (big pharma) ads, USG military recruiting ads, and political ads. Advertising on evening network television shows has increased in many cases to over 40-45% and volume is kicked up with most advertisements to annoying levels.  Studies show big corporations are willing to spend many millions on such advertising since it works and likely is a form of mindkontrol.  Certainly Bernays, the father of advertising sold it this way.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top