
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by beetree on 17 April 2014 - 09:04
It would appear the word "believe" can not be defined by this boards moralistic non-believers.
They are so worried about something. Wonder what that could be?
Pick yourself any dictionary you feel comfortable with, and I will go with that. I am sure you will now employ some other roadblock of your own making for more avoidance of simple questions. Must be a tough job parsing your way through conversations to this extent.
What tedium.

by GSDtravels on 17 April 2014 - 11:04
Avoidance? Asking you to clarify is avoidance? I see you missed more that the class where punctuation was being taught. You don't want a conversation, you want to appear intelligent and smug. It's not working well for ya!
by beetree on 17 April 2014 - 11:04
There it is again! Yawn. Perhaps three is a charm......
Do you believe in coincidence? Unconditional love?
PS: I see you believe you are correctly eading my mind? Well, you are wrong.
by beetree on 17 April 2014 - 12:04
So, you got your degree in ..... ? What?
If you think I don't know that I love run on sentences, comma's, and exclamation points, you might as well
also want to know.... So What? Just another attempt to avoid such simple questions!

by Carlin on 17 April 2014 - 14:04
So...
Shtal still can't prove to VK that God exists, and VK can't do any better proving to shtal that he doesn't -real shocker there.
Beyond that, we seem to have the original thought behind the thread. On that, I will just say that having briefly looked into the link, I do not in any way see the project's development having anything to do with affecting education, or even having anything to do with being a springboard for forwarding what is obviously tabloid fodder. This has a lot less to do with science and beliefs than it does with making a buck, only instead of the National Enquirer, post-modernity's version involves a digital solution. The Discovery and History Channels are famous for this kind of nonsense, but usually deal in more sensational, obscure, and potentially ominous subject matter. There's a reason this garbage is not, and will not be taught in the classroom or lecture hall, and I highly doubt that's what producers and filmakers have in mind when they sit down and determine whether or not to move forward with their projects. As long as someone's buying however...

by Shtal on 17 April 2014 - 15:04

by Carlin on 17 April 2014 - 15:04
And vk4 loves lies because that's the only way evolution can be explained, based on lies
I don't think evolution is based upon lies. I do understand the problems with trying to apply the theory so ambitiously so as to ascribe the rise of humanity to endosymbiosis, for instance.
In my opinion and experience, we all run into trouble when we try to fill in the gaps, to one end or the other.

by Shtal on 17 April 2014 - 15:04
Well, the ONLY observations we have like ggturner said is microevolution and beyond that we are simply stepping into philosophy at that point NOT science.

by Shtal on 17 April 2014 - 15:04
Carlin wrote: In my opinion and experience, we all run into trouble when we try to fill in the gaps, to one end or the other.

by GSD Admin on 17 April 2014 - 16:04
Carlin wrote: "In my opinion and experience, we all run into trouble when we try to fill in the gaps, to one end or the other."
lol, he is also meaning you Shtal, so give him a thumbs up for slapping down part of your position as well - see he can go either way because he always stays right in the middle with the riddles. Never really commits to much outside the safe zone.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top