Facts of Evolution. ( Title edit by Admin) - Page 6

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 17 September 2013 - 16:09

I know the NASA work, couldn't you have found a video that actually applied to this theory?
I guess god's answer was no.....it will go on forever into a whole new dimension now.

Inconsistencies?


 

Carlin

by Carlin on 17 September 2013 - 16:09

I'm not a big fan of this particular argument, but I will say that the fossil record is incomplete, and leaves the subject open to different theories.  My point was, what we historically think of as "supernatural", may in fact be very scientific, eventually.  I was walking around outside Sunday am like the good "heathern" I am, and watched 2 low-flying military choppers pass overhead, appreciating modern science and engineering (we have essentially no air traffic here).  I also wondered exactly how the sight would have struck someone of the ancient world, watching the same thing.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 17 September 2013 - 23:09

How would it have struck someone?

It's happened before,
white men visiting primitives in the rainforest in a piper cub on returning found the natives had built a piper cub out of sticks and had begun to worship it.

Source (National Geographic)


 

Carlin

by Carlin on 17 September 2013 - 23:09

Right, because they could not comprehend that kind of science. Ask the most studied physicist the extent to which science has defined the universe. It may be, that the little piece we currently apprehend isn't as representative of the whole we may assume it is.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 17 September 2013 - 23:09

Anything not explained must be supernatural.

A puzzle of infinite pieces of which we have three pieces.

Carlin

by Carlin on 17 September 2013 - 23:09

http://m.livescience.com/38339-experiments-bolster-schrodingers-cat-idea.html

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 18 September 2013 - 00:09

Not gonna click on it, what is it?

Carlin

by Carlin on 18 September 2013 - 00:09

University studies that support the idea (based on quantum mechanics) that there is possibly a dead moons at the same time there is a living moons. :)

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 18 September 2013 - 00:09

Based on theory,
I don't buy into a lot of the current theories at all.

Anything is possible.......in theory.

We'll see in the distant future, if mans survives long enough.

 

Hundmutter

by Hundmutter on 18 September 2013 - 03:09

Carlin, the flaw in your argument is that its hypothetical - its
pointless wondering what "people from the ancient world"
would make of military helicopters flying over them, cos the
two do not exist in the same time period.

Theories about time and relativity and other dimensions are
just theories still,  no proof yet they are fact, so we are stuck
with "what is".  Moons is correct about building an image to
worship of something seen but not yet understood.  Some
seem in danger of "worshipping" ideas about all sorts of space/
time issues they cannot prove.

The bit about the incomplete fossil record is nonsense;  the only
reasons its "incomplete" is that we haven't dug everything up yet
that there is to be found, and some stuff died in places where the
geology doesn't enable fossilisation.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top