
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by beetree on 17 June 2012 - 21:06
by brynjulf on 17 June 2012 - 21:06
by brynjulf on 17 June 2012 - 21:06
I don't think one person on here said to eliminate the test. I carefully read through everyones posts. What is being said is don't use the results definatively, weigh all factors.
by beetree on 17 June 2012 - 21:06
I don't want to derail. Maybe you can start a new thread so we can talk about this in more detail. I have said the same thing, except I will do what testing is available vs. not testing, because there is a need to find out more. And the genetic markers seem to be the starting point. Until there is perfection in the test, is it any more accurate for the rest of us to deny what we see happening before our very eyes?

by darylehret on 17 June 2012 - 22:06
Daryl, it isn't an official "list". You'd have to make your own from the half dozen or more DM threads that have accumulated on here. But you are good at that sort of thing, aren't you? I'd like to see it too, when you are done.
I was assuming that if someone were stating "so and so" many dogs died as a result of DM, they could present the sources to back up that statement. I'm not going to scour the database based on an assumption that's held no interest for me up to this point. The only first hand account I've heard was from the owner of a van den Heuvel dog a few years ago, and I'm no longer certain I can recall the breeding behind that dog.
by beetree on 18 June 2012 - 01:06

by darylehret on 18 June 2012 - 05:06
by dantes on 19 June 2012 - 08:06

by hunger4justice on 29 June 2012 - 05:06
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top