This is a placeholder text
Group text
by darylehret on 27 November 2010 - 02:11
Twisting words, as you often do. Nowhere did I say anything about wolves "actively hunting humans as a source of food". But I did say that they were exhibiting agressive and predatorial behaviors, without fear of humans.
I don't believe the school teacher was "consumed" by the wolf pack that killed her last March. As she was jogging, it's possible that they were responding to their instincts and persued as she "appeared" to be fleeing.
How does your "INDIVIDUAL problem animal" solution work in regards to a whole pack? And, when it actually IS an individual, how can it be known which one is the culprit? How does that solve the oversaturation problem? It DOESN'T work, and it's very obvious by now, in the regions where that approach has been taken.
You're supposition of a "creature that normally wants nothing to do with humans or their pets or livestock" is a complete fallacy. Humans perhaps not for eating, but livestock and pets are very easy meals, and that makes them all the more attractive.
I don't believe the school teacher was "consumed" by the wolf pack that killed her last March. As she was jogging, it's possible that they were responding to their instincts and persued as she "appeared" to be fleeing.
How does your "INDIVIDUAL problem animal" solution work in regards to a whole pack? And, when it actually IS an individual, how can it be known which one is the culprit? How does that solve the oversaturation problem? It DOESN'T work, and it's very obvious by now, in the regions where that approach has been taken.
You're supposition of a "creature that normally wants nothing to do with humans or their pets or livestock" is a complete fallacy. Humans perhaps not for eating, but livestock and pets are very easy meals, and that makes them all the more attractive.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top