
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by shrabe on 24 February 2010 - 04:02

by Liesjers on 24 February 2010 - 04:02
In the OP's case, I personally would be far more pissed that my explicit instructions were not followed. So this time it was "just" a vaccine but what's next? What if the dog had other special needs like an allergy, drug reaction, etc and the instructions were ignored?

by Jenni78 on 24 February 2010 - 13:02
The $116.25 is an "intact fee" put in place to "encourage" those of us who are irresponsible and stupid to neuter our animals. You have to pay it or they won't give you the rabies certificate.

by mollyandjack on 24 February 2010 - 14:02
Holy crap. Is that a state law where you live? Actually glad to live in NC right now, even though the vets here love Science Diet and lecture me every time I come in about neutering my dog. As if by not being neutered, he's going to magically create puppies by walking near female dogs. He must have nearly 1000 offspring by now...maybe some German Doodles!

by Jenni78 on 24 February 2010 - 14:02
by TessJ10 on 24 February 2010 - 14:02
I think the vets are just sick of hearing about all the "accidental" breedings. Nothing magic about it - they're brought up here on the pdb constantly, and you'd think these at least would be people who knew what they're doing, but nope, there's a lot of posts on here about "accidents." So it's frustrating for those of us who are responsible, but yeah, the vets have heard it all before....LOL, maybe I'll ask my vet how many "accidental" litters she's seen in the past 12 months from "responsible" breeders. Bet it's quite a few.
In addition, they get (a LOT) from people - "I didn't think I had to keep them apart because it's his own [mother, sister, other close relation] and surely they just WOULDN'T!!!!!!"

by Jenni78 on 24 February 2010 - 15:02
Tess, you're being quite nice by calling those people "responsible." Anyone who thinks you don't need to keep relative canines away from each other....................well nevermind.
I think w/vets it's more money than concern for the animal. Sorry, but vets consistently do things for money that aren't good for the animal. Why do they charge $30+ for a shot I can buy at Farm and Fleet for $4.99? And why do they say it has to be done every year when they know damn well it doesn't and can cause problems? Neutering and spaying makes them money. Not to mention all the money they get from all the side effects it causes. Plus, most of them are sheep; they just do what they were taught and rarely look at the agenda behind what they were taught (Science Diet, anyone?!)
I think vets need to be unbiased and look at every individual animal and decide what is in that animal's best interest- not what's in their wallet's best interest, and not what's in society's best interest. They are not in business as social responsibility police- they are in the field of ANIMAL HEALTH. Period. I need neither guidance nor opinions nor attempted guilt from them for doing what **I** think is right for MY animals.
by TessJ10 on 24 February 2010 - 16:02
oooo, oooo, pick me, pick me, I know this one! That's an easy answer: Vets charge $30 for a shot you can buy for $4.99 because the vet has to pay for, in addition to the shot, all kinds of stuff that I don't have to pay for:
building
grounds
utilities on same
maintenance on same
taxes on same
x-ray machines
techs salaries & benefits
computers
all other equipment (tables, scales, etc.)
microscopes
office supplies
insurance
Oh, yeah, and how about a salary for the vet??
and the $100,000+++ student loan debt the avg. new vet has today

by Jenni78 on 24 February 2010 - 16:02
Interesting to note the ONE holistic vet in my area is so booked, you can't get in for at least 3 mos. Now, don't you think she's making money? She charges consultation fees. She truly tries to find the root cause of what's wrong w/the dog, and only vaccinates as necessary. So here she is, making money hand over fist, and yet animals are not being harmed in the process. Huh. What a novel idea.
They all need to remember the "do no harm" oath they took. Regardless of their f'ing student loans.

by shrabe on 24 February 2010 - 16:02
Honestly the point is that they should be following the owners direction to the letter as far as I'm concerned. If the owner of the dog does not want said test, vac, or whatever done, it should not be done.Period!!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top