
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by apple on 08 March 2019 - 13:03
by Gustav on 08 March 2019 - 13:03
There were many more defensive type dogs(GS) in the seventies than you see today. How did they ever train them for patrol/police work? In the military in seventies America used no Malinois ( if you don’t believe me go look at pictures of Vietnam Nam dogs and you won’t see a Malinois) and extreme prey drive GS, yet they produced patrol, Sentry, Scout, Explosive, and Narcotic dogs that have documented histories of success. How was this done?
Again, it’s not an either or issue. Not all dogs back then were high defense, but generally they carried more instinctive reactive aggression than dogs today....yet they achieved lofty results. Balance and strong nerve are key, whether you are high prey or high defense...unfortunately there are many trainers experts today that can only train/desire what is inside their box!
by duke1965 on 08 March 2019 - 13:03
by apple on 08 March 2019 - 14:03
by apple on 08 March 2019 - 14:03
"We can learn from wise words, little from wisecracks, and less from wise guys."
by ValK on 08 March 2019 - 15:03
apple,
The first thing that comes to mind is how effective were those dogs at detection compared to modern dogs with much higher prey drive. Today, it is not uncommon to see Labs or even Cocker Spaniels doing detection work because of their prey drive. The world or drugs and explosives has taken on a whole new meaning since the 1970's, so greater precision is needed.
i'm curious how the dogs at border, with their lacking prey drive, was so successful in tracking and detection for such long time?
b.t.w. beside tracking, selecting person by the scent of things and vice versa finding an object by the scent of particular person, was mandatory part of training.
by apple on 08 March 2019 - 16:03
by ValK on 08 March 2019 - 18:03
locating stuff by scent is a detection. weapons, explosive, drugs, contraband, illegal by then anti-communist prints, etc. all that stuff have been searched for at custom cross-points by the german shepherd dogs. and guess what - i never heard any complains that they was bad in that and the border are in needs of labs and cocker spaniels.
i told it before and like to repeat - all that talks about need of prey drive in dog to excel in work is just sale point, if nothing else there to offer.
by apple on 08 March 2019 - 18:03
by Gustav on 09 March 2019 - 11:03
First, it takes more skill and knowledge to train a dog with less prey and more balance, in today’s world; because of the saturation of sport in breeding, selection and training.
Second, as I told someone over the phone today, when you start breeding FOR show, sport, political corrections, or a training methodology, then you are morphing the breed away from its versatile intent and functionality....and that is why the decline of the breed in functional areas and the proliferation of the breed in sport, show, and etc.
Sure, there are high prey dogs with good fight or defense traits, but these dogs are rare as the political correctness in the sport world prefers a high prey dog that is easily approachable. So the high prey dogs with strong hardness are not preferred, nor can achieve high points by any except few elite handlers/trainers....so these type dog slowly are fading from our selection process although they are useful for maintaining the balance needed so the breed DOES’NT become high prey with diminishing fight( in the working lines).
Still, I realize the lure of the ribbons, trophies, and pride of my dog being sired by THIS dog.....smh.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top