Facts of Evolution. ( Title edit by Admin) - Page 5

GSDtravels, are you afraid? No excuses please, or you afraid of the challenges like the last time lol I am fully ready to discuss unless of course you chicken out then I understand. Take care.

Shtal, you've challenged me about as much as first grade arithmetic, don't flatter yourself.  Your childlike ways are probably an asset to you in some ways.  Hey, whatever works.  I have neither the time nor the energy, just go read your bible.  

GSDtravels, then do me a favor don't start threads with my name for near future   you bait and then run away.


Pathetic, that is all I can say.



Shtal.

 

Curious as how  factual objects such as fossils and bones are explained by someone who does not believe in any evolution?

Shtal, I did not "bait" you, I posted a video for you to watch, just on the off chance that you would actually look at the evidence.  If you didn't understand it, fine.  If you'd like to refute anything it had to say, you have the stage.

GSDtravels,

Sorry I am replying a bit late; tomorrow I will get back to you and I will reply in writing, right now I 'am bit busy but I will share one video for now.
 

Erin - one of the things you will learn about Shtal
​is that he does not TRY to explain things like the
fossil record.  He relies on his Kent Hovind videos.
When that doesn't work, Shtal just ignores the
point / question, and takes off on another tack.  I
truly believe he is incapable of thinking rationally
for himself.  Spent some time trying to pin him
down, as I learned others had before me, without
result.

GSDtravels wrote: I posted a video for you to watch, just on the off chance that you would actually look at the evidence.  If you didn't understand it, fine.  If you'd like to refute anything it had to say, you have the stage.


Okay, then I will critic your video.
You are very comfortable with your theory; it gives you freedom to either reject God totally or to reject absolute authority of him (over a life). You could say there is a God but he didn’t do anything. This is my interpretation how you think; First you consider biological evolution besides enumerable transitional fossils dating billions and billions years to very primitive forms; Okay stop right their; you don’t give me any examples here of this, you allude to them, transitional fossils, I think you are dreaming GSDtravels, there are no transitional fossils, first of all let me point out, no fossils could count as evidence of evolution; think about it from logical perspective. You find bones in the dirt, you don’t know and certainly couldn’t prove that they had any kids that lived; if you think you found bones in the dirt and can prove that they had offspring that lived, please tell me how this can be done? How can you prove this bone(s) represents animal that had any offspring that survived. In the court of law this evidence won’t hold up. Your video saying there are enormous fossils - your video lied to you. You need to get a refund on any tuition money paid to learn that stupidity because it’s not true. And if you still believe that video shame on you; it’s not true there are no transitional fossils and no fossils would count anyway. If you find a fossil that weird looking, okay, what does that proof? It proofs you found weird looking fossil; it might be an animal that went extinct that no longer lives on the planet; doesn’t have to be intermediate between something; lol where are the 3-legged animals?
I’ll bet if you gave a skeleton of Chihuahua to somebody who never seeing Chihuahua dog and you say what is this animal look like; there is no telling, they might make it look like a reptile, how would you know if it is cold blooded or warm blooded from just looking at the skeleton. So basically these fossils; you have to invent the history for this or invent the interpretation - whereas things that we observed today they give you all information what you need.  First there are no transitional fossils; secondly no fossils count of any kind for argument of evolution. Science deals with things that we can observed, study and test, you don’t observe fossils having kids; you don’t know if they had any kids that lived. And your video saying about dating billions of years to a very primitive forms; I would stop right there, you don’t know if they are dating billions of years, I already explained this before about dating methods. Fossils are dated by geologic position; not at all by any other methods.

You couldn't tell the difference between a Chihuahua, a canine, and a lizard, a reptile by examining bones?
Please..........
Science is lacking I'll give you that, but to claim the existence of anything supernatural is simply wishing and completely a groundless fantasy.

PLEASE GOD....... end this debate.

Science is lacking I'll give you that, but to claim the existence of anything supernatural is simply wishing and completely a groundless fantasy.

What if you replaced the word "supernatural", with "supernormal", to describe inconsistencies in the natural world.  Nasa has proven the existence of the 4th dimension, for instance.  An inhabitant of the 4th dimension existing in the same proximity to a 3rd dimensional creature such as ourselves would not be fully visible to us.  Physics can't explain what happens at the center of the black hole.  Quantum theory offers that there may exist many realities occurring parallel to to the one perceived.  Science is based on what is observable, but, how much of "everything" can we really observe?