This is a placeholder text
Group text
by rush on 03 March 2011 - 04:03
by vithala on 03 March 2011 - 14:03
To stay on point, here's another video of Close Quater Combat involving a dog. It is a preview of a DVD to be released in the US by March 30th, and has SOP's taught by Police K9 Instructor Bernhard Flinks and Combatives Coach Vit Singh.
I posted it before and it didn't stay up but here goes it again. It's simply a video response to the current thread about watching dogs train in CQ with their handler.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z60ALL-xxqc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BgPNs6S84w
by Pirates Lair on 03 March 2011 - 15:03
Kim
by SportySchGuy on 03 March 2011 - 16:03
My point is being missed or misunderstood. My point is that the training scenario in the video is a poor one. It should never be done that way in the first place. Of course in that situation you would need to watch your dog so the decoy doesn't get bitten in the face. That is one reason it is such a poor training scenario. At the very least there should be a training director or at least some knowledgable person overseing the scenario making sure the dog does not bite the decoy in an unprotected area. The handler should not be in a training situation like that where they also have to be concerned what their dog is doing. What if the handler was not in a position to see where the dog was going? Maybe there were people around for safety but that is not the point. My concern is how it looks to the public. Someone will see that and think it is a good idea and not know all the ins and outs and they will get hurt. It is irresponsible to post a video like that IMO. I'm not talking about reading your dog. In that scenario you are fighting for your life and you are not going to be in a position mentally and sometimes physically to "read" your dog. So if the decoy is placed in a vulnerable position like that then you must have someone else overseeing for obvious safety reasons. Also, for the last time ....I will NEVER post a video on the internet. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER.
by OGBS on 03 March 2011 - 22:03
by SportySchGuy on 03 March 2011 - 22:03
by OGBS on 03 March 2011 - 23:03
It was only that your "Never, Never, Never" reminded me of an episode of Two and a Half Men.
{Nice job of trying to back out of your initial incorrect post, though.}
by troublelinx on 03 March 2011 - 23:03
by Jenni78 on 03 March 2011 - 23:03
I
N
N
I
N
G!
by SportySchGuy on 04 March 2011 - 00:03
Getting criticized by a cyberstalker that creeps out multiple people to the extent they block email, text and screen calls hurts me real bad. Please please take it back???
Winning! Google is your friend!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top