CLINTON HIT MAN LARRY NICHOLS HILLARY MUST BE STOPPED - Page 4

Oh, you've caught onto the "mind games", which actually only reside in one mind? Yes, you nailed it! Great post!

Yeah, I have the power of komplete mind kontrol! lol

...oops, wrong thread.

Noitsyou: SPOT ON !

I probably don't need to add to your thorough coverage of the issue, but just one thing that other readers can do as an exercise in judgement:

Imagine, if you can, that last nights debate was between any male Democratic candidate and a female version of Trump.

Picture a Republican woman shouting over her rival; hovering menacingly while its her rival's turn to speak; denying she'd said things there was ample online evidence that she had said; claiming that the things she HAS said are 'only talk' and did not record the actions that went with them; humming and hawing about matters involving foreign policy... Imagine a completely politically inexperienced woman insisting she has better political nous than her opponent who has spent decades at the forefront of politics.

Imagine a woman candidate bringing along a group of men to a press conference to denounce the opponent for having offended against them in any way, just prior to a Presidential Debate.

 

What works for men will not work for women; women are always "too shrill", "too loud", too this, too that, (for commentators still carrying a torch for that old double standard.)

"Too obviously smart for a woman" ???  "Not necessarily attractive" (Fox News anchor) ???  These are indications of something old and nasty and dark still besetting the electorate.

 

After Debate #1 it was so obvious that Hillary Clinton was the superior candidate (despite anything that can legitimately be said against her);  that was confirmed last night in Debate #2 - yet Icky Enema could still win the election, because he is a he not a she.

 

@Noitsyou. What do you base your judgment on the amount of effort I give to a post responding to you? That is twice now, for you to make that claim. Taking up real estate in your head or any head, isn't my goal, either. If I have a knack ending up there for some folks, it isn't me looking for a way in. Somebody is opening their own front door.

Or, possibly that earwig of yours is still busy with earwig agendas, that would be typical for here, too? If so, I just got to wait that one out.

On the political issues, I don't feel the need to readdress your points where I still disagree. I do notice you won't take notice when we do agree.

Glad you found yourself a welcome home, here. It is always nice to feel appreciated for just being one's own self.

@beetree, I don't know what the point of that post was but what I do know is that I took the time to post about the topic while you took the time to post about me.

Yes, I addressed your comments about me. I usually will defend myself if I feel it is needed.
I also addressed how you approached the topic, but that part was ignored by you.

I can completely ignore you going forward, if you prefer, if you can't follow my own style of replies.

I'm not taking the bait.

What bait?

I'll post about the topics but won't get into a whole he said, she said diversion. You can post about how you believe my mind works all you want if you find me a more interesting topic than Trump and Clinton. I won't get sucked into it however and start defending myself on a personal level. You are free to respond to this by saying you didn't say this or that or whatever but like I said, I won't follow you down that he said, she said path.