
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by vk4gsd on 09 October 2014 - 19:10

by yellowrose of Texas on 09 October 2014 - 19:10
Our Government was Founded on GOD...
NO need to dispute it either...go read HISTORY. Some people have no knowledge what the phrase "Seperation of Church and State means...it means POWER not religion... GO read your documents of our Country's origin
THIS is the United States of America "no Emperor or Ruling Earthly King over us"...THANK GOD>>for that..
YR
by Bob McKown on 09 October 2014 - 19:10
"Separation of church and state" (sometimes "wall of separation between church and state") is a phrase used by Thomas Jefferson and others expressing an understanding of the intent and function of the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clauseof the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. The phrase has since been repeatedly used by the Supreme Court of the United States.
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..." and Article VI specifies that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."
Echoing the language of the founder of the first Baptist church in America, Roger Williams—who had written in 1644 of "[A] hedge or wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world"—Jefferson wrote, "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."
by vk4gsd on 09 October 2014 - 20:10
" Look over the past 50 years and see the rise of liberalism and it,s effect on our society and culture. Only a blind idiot or liar would not agree that the more liberal a country gets the more social upheaval,s begins to tear it apart."
Reggie you need to do some research on this, go look at the crime rtes, standard of living, literacy levels, education standards...any other measure of general well being for all nations, you might get a shock that your hypothesis is factually incorrect.
the most religious countries are suffering the most and creating their own hell on earth, the most liberal and atheist countries are actually doing much better on all measures, start your research with northern europe, then compare to more religous countries ie, amerca (north & south), middle east etc and make your own conclusion based on actual evidence.
i would like to see if your opinion remains the same.
by Bob McKown on 09 October 2014 - 20:10
Your comparring Countries about the size of Texas to the United States of America. I rest my case.

by GSDtravels on 09 October 2014 - 21:10
Sorry YR, our government was founded on freedom and religion is the antithesis of that.

by GSDtravels on 09 October 2014 - 21:10
A better question is why should his church have to change?
I don't know, I wasn't aware that it had to change.
The State has no right telling the Church how to run...and visa versa
And how, exactly, is the State Telling the Church how to run?

by Mountain Lion on 09 October 2014 - 21:10
Here is just a one example...
a church camp meeting association in Ocean Grove, New Jersey was sued because they refused to allow a same-sex wedding ceremony to take place in one of its facilities. This is just one example of attempts by the pro-homosexual lobby to impose its view of marriage directly on religious organizations and people, and it won’t be the last. You can learn more about other attacks on religious freedom by same-sex “marriage” proponents and what ADF is doing about it on ADF’s main website.
by vk4gsd on 09 October 2014 - 21:10
^ your examples occurred prior to this new law, how did this new law, the topic under discussion, "tell" the church it has to do anything, did it mention any specific church and what the church should do to change, new more gay friendly decor?
by vk4gsd on 09 October 2014 - 21:10
Reggie you are now saying it is not liberalism that has the effect on morals it is actually surface area of a country?
goal post shift much, when your done explaining how more liberal countries have less crime and a better standard of living shown by the evidence in complete contrast to your claim, then please explain the further surface area effect.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top