
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Uber Land on 05 February 2009 - 20:02

by Uber Land on 05 February 2009 - 20:02

by funky munky on 05 February 2009 - 21:02

by snajper69 on 05 February 2009 - 21:02

by funky munky on 05 February 2009 - 21:02

by VonIsengard on 05 February 2009 - 23:02
BTW- This pic I'm sure you are referring to is of "Brixx" He was strained and leaning so horribly to get to his daddy I'm surprised he didn't fall on his face. There is a newer photo of him here on the database and you can clearly see his rear angulation is in no way extreme, although he is rather heavy in the body. I have advised to keep him lighter in weight.
Also, please note I said I like the puppy's type. I did not comment on him past that. I pointed out that you can't judge a young dog on one photo. I do not defend any showline dog, I sure as hell don't defend the ones who can't work. But I will not judge a dog, for good or ill, that I cannot see for myself. I have seen very poor movement and extreme angles (in person) and I do not like it one bit.
by Promethean on 06 February 2009 - 05:02
Give me a real GSD, like the ones the good Captain had in mind. Nowadays it is next to impossible to find a straght backed, properly angled dog like the greats of old; Klodo vom Boxberg and Horand von Grafrath

by CrysBuck25 on 06 February 2009 - 05:02
Ok, Folks...
It seems I've kicked a hornet's nest on this one. I didn't like the way this pup was standing. Yes, I know that the handler is the person who put this dog in this ridiculous position, but some of it could definitely be the pup himself. If you're a fan of that type, great. I think he looks like he's too hunched up, to me. I've seen lots of pictures of pups at his age, and I haven't seen many that showed the pup looking so poorly.
Badgsd...The dog in my avatar was my Ambred German Shepherd Dog Prince. I know he didn't have great structure. I was a stupid kid when I got him from a puppy mill backyard breeder. I never said my boy was the epitome of what Max von Stephanitz envisioned. He was weak nerved, and not great in structure. I never intended to breed him, just wanted a friend and companion. He wasn't great, not even really a GOOD GSD, but at least he didn't look like he was going to collapse in the rear end. Perhaps you like that type, and if so, that's fine with me. I personally prefer a dog that has less of a 'roach' in its back, and less excessive angulation.
As for what I'm "into", I prefer a GSD with good color, great temperament, excellent structure, and most importantly, not over angulated because that's what the show ring want this year. I'm not saying that your showlines are bad...A lot of them are absolutely stunning dogs to look at. All I'm saying is that good structure, and proper angulation, should be obvious even as a puppy.
With regard to the issue of WL versus SL versus Ambred, it's sad to see such an incredible division of opinions. I don't know what Captain von Stephanitz would say about what's happened to the breed he founded, but I'd think he'd be disappointed to see how those who love this breed can treat each other so badly over an opinion. After all, we're all entitled to our opinions, aren't we? The majority of the response to my post were opinions, both in agreement and not, with mine, but only a couple felt the need to put me down and point to my own dog, whom I freely agree has poor structure. No arguement there.
I'm sorry if I've offended anyone here, but I am entitled to my opinion.
Crys

by CrysBuck25 on 06 February 2009 - 05:02
Crys

by wuzzup on 06 February 2009 - 06:02
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top