
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Mindhunt on 02 February 2009 - 14:02

by ocoey on 02 February 2009 - 15:02
I think you might have great success using at least the science behind clicker training Missbeeb . You may even realize that's sort of what you have been doing all along. Using a clicker does not replace a command, you will still have to say "what me".
I have to go with 4pack on this one. I find the sound of my voice easier and I always have it with me. The tone on the e-collar is exactly the same as a click. I could even argue that it might be better because the tone is near the dog's ear making it useful in a noisy situations and at distance. Although most clicker trainers would faint if your pulled out an e-collar. There is no reason why you can't condition in the several reinforces: the click, a vocal ‘good’, the e-collar tone and a hand signal (and ‘No’....associated with a correction).
Do I think a police dog could be trained entirely with a clicker? Nope, I don't. Perhaps the foundation work. At some point in time you are going to want the dog to do something that it disagrees with, especially a thinking dog like a GSD. The dog can't see the whole picture.
by Eric Read on 02 February 2009 - 15:02

by ShelleyR on 02 February 2009 - 16:02
My sentiments exactly. Sure, most of us have seen clicker training used effectively, especially in pet dog training, but as far as my training is concerned a clicker is in the same category as a bad hat... You need two. One to crap on and one the cover it up with.
SS
by Jeff Oehlsen on 03 February 2009 - 01:02
I am not a cop, and I am pretty sure that teaching my dog to turn on the basket during the object guard is not what you are calling real life. LOL
If you are a cop and your dog goes and barks at the bad guy, you don't "click" and then run and treat, because you are past the point where it is used. This is where I think people are getting confused. I am not sure that I do it the correct way, but my dog doesn't live in a tank, and there are not convenient buckets of fish laying around everywhere I go.
If I am wanting to get a very specific behavior, like moving a foot, rotating a certain way, holding something still, the clicker is WAY more accurate than my voice. I use it to teach the dog in the beginning, not the end.
Like I said, not sure I do it right, but I use it to get the dog to do something the way "I" want it done,and it works pretty good.
When you get used to a clicker, you will see how rediculously more accurate it is. I suck at it, and I am still better and clearer than with my voice. I babble and get excited, and say the wrong thing all the time.
by ocoey on 03 February 2009 - 01:02
That is also the way I was taught to use the clicker Jeff. Love the object guard exercise BTW!
You teach the dog that 'click' (or 'yes' or 'beep' or whatever) means food is coming by clicking and feeding. No other requirement. This if often called 'loading'. Then you pick a movement to reinforce; for example moving the left back foot. Any time there is movement in the left back foot, you click. No talking, just wait for the dog to figure it out (shutting up is hard for me!). Traditional ‘clicker trainers’ wait for behavior to happen, no luring, Others choose to lure...I have seen both work (luring in faster IMHO). As Jeff says it is absolutely amazing how quickly the dog figures the game out and how precise you can be! One you have the dog offering the behavior freely ... you start to feel like a bloody Pez dispenser... you add a command just before you know the dog will offer the behavior. You can tweak things simply by adjusting what you reward. Only reward fast sits, only reward straight sits, whatever, just work one thing at a time. Don’t try fast and straight sits, that will come with practice. The idea here is that the command (or signal) is useful information to the dog. The command always precedes the foot lift that precedes the food. Since the command comes first it is the fastest route to the food. Once you have the behavior on command (and have added distractions), how you reinforce it is up to you. Traditional clickers would use reinforcement schedules and continue food usage. Others choose to add a correction if the command is not followed.
So using the police dog as an example if some rewarded 'out' with a click (which I personally would not choose to do) the dog would already understand the command long before he was faced with a real bad guy so the clicker would never even be an issue.
by Christopher Smith on 03 February 2009 - 02:02
Jeff don’t waste your time. If people still think that a clicker is used after a behavior is learned, they are too stupid to be reasoned with.
by ocoey on 03 February 2009 - 02:02
Always suprises me when someone toting the clicker training methods uses an adversive to try to teach their method

Hope you don't judge your dog that quickly....

by Mindhunt on 03 February 2009 - 03:02
Christopher, I am sorry that you misinterpreted my question. That is the drawback with message boards, body language, facial expressions, tone of voice can not be used to clarify how a questions is asked. I do know clicker concept and it is useful. I am sorry you think I may be "too stupid to be reasoned with". I will attribute this to a bad interpretation. LOL

by ShelleyR on 03 February 2009 - 15:02
"OUT-SEES!
Let out Sweetie-shuggums.
Puleese.
Pretty please? with a cherry on top?"
Oh f*#k this stupid thing. [toss] Hand me my sharp pinch collar.
Now... OUT or DIE DOG!
Good doggie!
[click-click]
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top