
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by joanro on 13 May 2016 - 19:05
A year earlier than that vid, I put him on the back tie in an unfamiliar place for him. Had the same decoy put quite a bit of very unfamiliar pressure on the dogso I could see the dog's reaction.
Then a year after, I had opportunity for the decoy to come to work the dog the second time and see if the dog was game on unfamiliar bad footing on slick bed liner.....not training, dog still hasn't had any bite training, but I am confident of what he presents when someone comes to the front gate, he is what he presents.

by susie on 13 May 2016 - 20:05
I don´t know what is funny about my post ( I like the pup, but I don´t like the training ).
It´s a friendly, playful dog, not knowing yet what to do, but without major faults - I just don´t like the training.
by joanro on 13 May 2016 - 20:05
I agree that hans' little female has potential, is just having a good time, not knowing what to do.

by Prager on 13 May 2016 - 23:05

by Prager on 13 May 2016 - 23:05
.@ suzi:
Muzzles in Czech for example are used in public transportation and in public . That is the law. Not so in the US. That was what I was referring to.
I have bred, trained, socialized,lived with, loved and and developed this pup and you like it. Thank you for validating my breeding, training, socialization and development of my pup. Yet, since you hate me, you do not like the training which made the pup. I am sorry but THAT is funny to me.
You train one way and I train different way. That is OK:) I am actually glad that you do not like my training. That validates my points. With all due respect you are different type of trainer. I am against such training where sport is linearly developed into protection dog as you described it at other thread. To me that is totally illogical, inappropriate, wrong and yes even dangerous. One of the reasons you and handful of others here do not like the training is because they do not understand what is going on there. Like when balckmalinois said :"I never understand what they wanna proove with above video ...."
I do not want to "proove" anything. FYI. I am just showing IMO nice pup which I have bred, trained, socialized, lived with and developed and put her on the path of a PP dog from "day 1" rather then turning dog via sportism into sport dog and then into PP/LE dog where the dog is taught to bite equipment and not the man and then switch and try to convince the dog not to bite the equipment but to bite the man instead. Please forgive me but that is a epitome of contradiction , confusion and illogical training. And I do not care if it is a system done by most experts or not.
Your feedback is greatly appreciated.
by joanro on 13 May 2016 - 23:05
by beetree on 13 May 2016 - 23:05
All they need ... Is the test! I have my stories. Matter of fact, that will be my next thread!

by Prager on 13 May 2016 - 23:05
by joanro on 14 May 2016 - 00:05
Bee, he's not a 'pet' if you are talking about my dog. He's not the type to be allowed to jump on the couch, or fire him up playing ball a lot, etc. He is a watch dog, and companion, and is obedient. Untrained in bite work, I didn't say untrained in obedience.
But as for how many untrained and civil pets....I bet there are more than you think. Lots of dogs in the news tearing people up and puting them in the hospital that were never 'trained' in bite work. That's why dogs need to be obedience trained and under control ...
by beetree on 14 May 2016 - 00:05
I know enough to make that distinction with you and your dogs. I actually trust your judgment and skills. Some of the more bombastic types that have to create their own vocabulary and create a following who will repeat it, are marketers, first. IMHO.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top