
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by itisdieter on 04 November 2014 - 04:11
IMHO, training is the issue.
How many who protection train allow the helper to do corrections during training?
From what I saw in the video, those dogs were trained allowing helper corrections during training and reacted in real life exactly as they did in training. Once a grip is made, it should not be disengaged until commanded by the handler, period.
I've made the mistake of allowing helper corrections with my first dog, it will not happen with the next one.
I honestly think this was a training issue.
by duke1965 on 04 November 2014 - 12:11
in this situation, without any excuses, the first dog should have taken him down, period, many of todays dogs perform well on the suit and sleeve as in trained behaviour, the percentage of dogs passing real civil testing or are willing to engage without problem after being muzzled is amazingly low
by Kevin Nance on 04 November 2014 - 15:11
by duke1965 on 05 November 2014 - 13:11
kevin, try to hit myke tyson in the mouth and see wath happens
by Cheryl Nance on 05 November 2014 - 14:11
Would not be a pretty outcome (for me).
K
by duke1965 on 05 November 2014 - 19:11
and now who do you hire to protect your life, Mike Tyson or Jacky Chan
by vk4gsd on 05 November 2014 - 20:11
mike tyson / jackie chan, guys the 90's are done.

by susie on 05 November 2014 - 20:11
None of them
I tend to go with the street fighter, who isn´t afraid to get harmed, but becomes more agressive the more pressure is exerted from the opponent.
( some training, some obedience = my kind of dog...)
by vk4gsd on 05 November 2014 - 20:11
i think they should bring back moats filled with hungry sharks, sharks in a moat beats tyson + Chan.
by zdog on 05 November 2014 - 20:11
oh please, you're down under. Probably still hooked on Hasslehoff and the A-team. You haven't even met Tyson and Chan yet
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top