
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by lhczth on 07 February 2013 - 21:02
I meant to add that my Belschik daughter produced 2 smaller males and 6 large males (85# up to well over 90#). The females have all been around medium sized.
Lisa
by lhczth on 07 February 2013 - 21:02
"I've always loved Belschik's physical appearance, in addition to his work ethic--though it wouldn't break my heart if the screeching trait fell by the wayside....as long as the loss of it didn't diminish the rest. "
Hexe, LOL I know what you mean and agree.
Lisa
by workingdogz on 07 February 2013 - 22:02
The comments I made were referencing undersize dogs, not dogs within the
standard. Obviously there is a difference.
And, while it's great to hear feedback on a direct breeding, the question posed here
was about linebreeding on the dog, not direct progeny.
Once again, if memory is correct, when Rinus did the 'Optikas D' nest, which was
linebred 2-3 on Belschik, that was a mixed bag of results, yes the progeny had
off the charts drive etc, but there was control issues with Dark as well as undersize
issues with the litter. I see Dark is listed as being SG, but I'm not sure thats an
accurate rating. So again, I will stick by the comments I made in regards to both size
being a possible serious issue as well as clarity, ability to cap etc.
by vomeisenhaus on 08 February 2013 - 00:02
by hexe on 08 February 2013 - 02:02
[vomeisenhaus, you got the HUGE midgets reference, no?]
by CrashKerry on 08 February 2013 - 06:02
http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/breeding.result?father=663041&mother=576705
by workingdogz on 08 February 2013 - 10:02
I am not sure where I stated Rinus thought the 'D' litter was a bust?
Could you please point that out to me?
And again, I believe I also said you would also have to take into account the other dogs
being linebred on as well. So again, you have pretty much re-iterated what I already
said a couple of times.
One more time for clarity, if one is going to linebreed on Belschik, you will want to
watch size, and of course clarity of nerve & temperment. Also watch for missing testicles.
A litter of 6 that produces dogs of a mixed bag of size is not consistent to me, if it is for you,
then we have different ideals, and thats fine. It seems to have been a theme in the few litters
that were sired by him in this country. And that was done by people that were trying to 'recreate'
the V litter Dalenberghutte through Berry v Neuen Lande etc- Belschik-Rani type cross.
While the drive and working ability was mostly passed on, the typical shreiking he did was too,
and some had experienced a real problem in trying to get these dogs to stay clear in their work.
I would imagine if you kept trying to concentrate that you might end up with a heck of a problem
down the road. A dog can have all the drive in the world but if his brain cannot balance it out,
he's not much good is he?
I'm done, I have stated several times some things someone may want to take into close
consideration when doing a linebreeding on one particular dog, and it's rather tiresome to
have to repeat it because someone seems to want to prove that a small to medium size dog
is somehow 'better' than a larger dog. Whatever dog gets the job done is the best dog for that job.
The one thing that I would be concerned about would be undersize, please read that, not small
or medium, undersized dogs resulting from linebreeding on this particular dog.
by Gustav on 08 February 2013 - 12:02
by Smiley on 08 February 2013 - 16:02
Sarah Minsk
by Runag on 08 February 2013 - 19:02
| OPTIKAS DARK | XAMM V D DAELENBERGHUTTE (IMP BEL) |
BELSCHIK VON EICKEN-BRUCHE1XWUSV, SCHH3 (G-BSP), FH1 Kkl 2 |
|
| RANI V D DAELENBERGHUTTE | |||
| ZOHRA V D DAELENBERGHUTTE (IMP BEL) | UGO VON BERENSWALD | ||
| VICKY V D DAELENBERGHUTTE | |||
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top




