
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Judy P on 09 November 2012 - 02:11

by laura271 on 09 November 2012 - 15:11
Most folks here know I'm a PhD student and that my research area involves Detroit. I can verify Judy P.'s comment about the increased prevalence of lepto in Detroit which is believed to be related to exposure to infected rats which have proliferated due to the thousands of abandoned properties. You can read more about it here and here. For the record, I choose to vaccinate my dogs for lepto since they have a high risk lifestyle - lots of standing water and potential exposure to infected cow, rat, dog, and raccoon urine.

by Jenni78 on 09 November 2012 - 15:11
by joanro on 09 November 2012 - 16:11

by laura271 on 09 November 2012 - 16:11
by Nans gsd on 09 November 2012 - 16:11
by beetree on 09 November 2012 - 16:11
Jenni, what size dog was your neighbor's and how long ago was it?
Which Pets are likely to have Vaccination Reactions?
In October 2005, a study by Moore et al was published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association in which over 1 million canine medical records in over 350 separate animal hospitals were reviewed. In this study, approximately one in 250 dogs had some sort of vaccination reaction, which translated to 13 reactions for every 10,000 doses of vaccine given.
The group at greatest risk for reaction were small breed young adult (age 1-3 years) neutered male dogs. As a dog's size increased, the risk of vaccination reaction dropped. Not surprisingly, the more vaccines were given at one time, the higher the risk of reaction. Some vaccine doses include vaccine against multiple organisms. These are called multivalent vaccines and include the basic distemper-parvo vaccine for dogs and some Bordetella vaccines. Since giving more vaccines at once is associated with increased risk of reaction, one might expect that the use of multivalent vaccines would also increase the risk of reaction, but surprisingly this was not found to be the case. Most reactions occur the same day as the vaccine is given.
http://www.veterinarypartner.com/Content.plx?P=A&A=527
by HighDesertGSD on 09 November 2012 - 17:11
by hexe on 10 November 2012 - 05:11
Yes, and the original poster's dogs died from the disease, because by the time it was diagnosed, it had done too much damage.
Is either end-result worse than the other?
If there's risk of exposure to the disease, the decision not to vaccinate needs to be made as an educated choice on a case by case basis--not just a blanket abandonment of an immunization because some dogs have adverse reactions. The truth is that in the grand scheme of things, when you tot up the number of dogs that received lepto vaccinations and then pull out the sub-set which had adverse responses of ANY kind [I'll be generous and not just limit it to death], that sub-set is statistically insignificant. It's just not even close to being as 'dangerous' to use as some try to make it out to be.
My dogs always have been, and always will be, vaccinated against leptospirosis, because I feel the benefit outweighs any risk.
My cattle are also vaccinated against lepto, BTW--because the disease has 'adverse effects' on that species, too.

by laura271 on 10 November 2012 - 13:11
Good post Hexe! Whenever I see email signatures proudly proclaiming "vaccine free" (common in raw feeding groups), I always wonder if the poster can clearly articulate why he/she chose not to vaccinate their pets for specific illnesses instead of applying a blind, blanket rule of "all vaccines bad". Of course, I feel the same way about the folks who shrilly claim that there is only one "true" model of raw feeding too.
I better go have another cup of coffee because I'm sounding cranky.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top