
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by hexe on 14 August 2012 - 22:08
When breeders claims they don't make any money from the sale of a litter, they're counting the cost of just maintaining the bitch pre-pregnancy, pregnant, and post-pregnancy, in addition to the cost of feeding the pups when weaned and any vaccination and worming costs involved for them. If you take the cost of maintaining the bitch out of the equation, though, breeders DO make money from the litters--it's just a matter of whether they're trying to make their living from the practice, or to just make enough to cover the costs of showing, trialing, etc. Those making a living from breeding are more likely to bred back to back heat cycles, but those are also the ones that tend not to keep any of their females once they've passed their prime breeding ages--why feed a bitch that is probably only to have litters of 3-5 pups, when they can feed one that will produces litters of 8-12 pups for the same amount of care?

by GSDguy08 on 14 August 2012 - 22:08

by Jenni78 on 14 August 2012 - 23:08
Hexe is right- the canine uterus is aging with every cycle, bred or not. Better to breed them often and young.

by marjorie on 14 August 2012 - 23:08
That is aviolation of Ebays TOS! This person should be reported!
Marjorie
http://www.gsdbbr.org The German Shepherd Dog Breed Betterment Registry (a health registry for registered German Shepherds)
BE PROACTIVE!
http://mzjf.com --> The Degenerative Myelopathy Support Group http://www.mzjf.info/hgate Heaven's Gate

by GSDguy08 on 14 August 2012 - 23:08

by EuroShepherd on 14 August 2012 - 23:08
The oldest I've ever bred any of my own females is 6 yrs, I've never had more than 3 litters from any female that I personally bred. (One GSD female, 2 mini doxie females)
I only breed if I was interested in keeping back a pup. I personally hate selling (not because I hate seeing the puppies go, but because I really hate selling, I suck as a sales person.) But, if I was to really get into breeding yearly then the absolute tops for me would be breeding a female back-to-back, skip, back-to-back, skip, etc. starting at 2 yrs and ending around the 6th birthday. Which would be a total of 6 litters and a comfortable age for a female to retire (possibly to a new indoor family home.)

by yellowrose of Texas on 14 August 2012 - 23:08
It is very common in Germany, Belgium or many excellent German shepherd kennels, under excellent progheny , of good health bitches 9 yrs old are bred. MANY of them are bred back to back, as an excellent healthy , german shepherd, of which there are many, and is bred to proper males, under the assumption, we have well knowledge breeding, no health problems and that is not a rare thing, contary to some postings., a bitch at 9 yrs old can safely have a nice 6, 7 pup litter.
There is a difference in the calipher of breeder and the calipher of dog , line or kennel .
DO not short sell , people in the breeding of germans, not knowing that their dog is eligible.
The breeders of our breed I know , would not breed if they did not have strong , healthy females.
IT Depends on the line and the dog.
IS is safe or healthy to breed a 20 month old female??? NO can be that anwser also..THAT is a teen ager...A dogs body is not firmly charged with its full growth patterns and has still not been healthy long enough or is old enough to be properly evaluated. A lot of people breed 20 month old bitches..I am under the opinion that is it much safer to breed a 9 yrs old healthy bitch , than a questionable yet a youngster 20 month old female and we read about it all the time..
A big question to think about...IT all depends on the individual health of the female and her record of progheny.
YR
by hexe on 15 August 2012 - 00:08
The same circumstances used to proliferate among horse breeders, though they only got a single foal to sell from each breeding; but that was when there was an outlet for unwanted horses that breeders were aware of but hated the thought of, as they produced a new colt or filly every year. Now that there aren't any slaughterhouses in the US that are buying the 'excess' horses--the ones that can't run anymore, the ones that aren't rideable, those whose owners can't afford the price of keeping and feeding a horse--the prices for the majority of horses born each year is in the toilet, and unless you've got a major reputation on the show circuits, rodeos or race tracks, you count your blessings if you can get $100.00 for a 'green' foal or yearling. If a similar situation befell the dog breeders here in the US, it would be quite interesting to see how many people drop out of the game.
I see two separate discussions in this thread: there's the science of breeding at each estrus and into the early senior years, and then there's the debate as to what constitutes unscrupulous breeding practices. I'm not in the mood for the latter, so I focused on answering the questions pertaining to the first.

by live4schutzhund on 15 August 2012 - 01:08
Price and breeding practices are two separate issues entirely and should not be referenced together. Too high or too low a price is another topic. Breeders needing the money risking there animals health...yes.
If someone wants to start a topic about puppy pricing, business models and sales metrics I would love to participate.
The price of a puppy has nothing to do with whether a female should or should not be bred.
Separate issues.
by Hutchins on 15 August 2012 - 12:08
I WOULD NEVER BREED A BITCH OVER 7 Yrs old! THATS MY OPINION! More power to those who would!
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top